To: CanisMajor2002
Constitutional restrictions on police intrusions should not be ignored just because it makes it impossible for police to do certain things. Those restrictions are there for a reason.
7 posted on
09/12/2003 6:41:42 AM PDT by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: *Privacy_list
To: eno_
Constitutional restrictions on police intrusions should not be ignored just because it makes it impossible for police to do certain things. Those restrictions are there for a reason. Heck, we already ignore some pieces of the Constitution... </sarcasm>
I guess now I'm curious as to what investigators CAN do that doesn't constitute illegal search-and-seizure...
9 posted on
09/12/2003 6:46:56 AM PDT by
CanisMajor2002
(Government grows when permanent agencies are raised to handle episodic phenomena.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson