"The devices in this case were in place for approximately 2.5 weeks," Justice Madsen wrote. "It is unlikely that the sheriff's department could have successfully maintained uninterrupted 24-hour surveillance throughout this time by following Jackson."
It seems like the suspicions of the police were well founded. No unreasonable force or coercion was applied. It seems strange that the courts won't let the police benefit from the use of technology to do their work. It looks like the ACLU and its hack supporters on the bench are hard at work making the work of criminals safe.
ML/NJ