Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Resists Nuclear Statement Deadline
AP via The Las Vegas Sun ^ | September 11, 2003 | GEORGE JAHN

Posted on 09/11/2003 4:26:53 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife

Iran warned Thursday that it will not accept an October deadline to prove its nuclear aims are peaceful. But support grew at a key U.N. atomic agency meeting for that timeframe, which could set the stage for Security Council action against Tehran.

Diplomats said that by late Thursday substantially more than 20 members of the 35-nation International Atomic Energy Agency board of governors indicated they would vote in favor of the timeframe, with an unknown number of likely abstentions.

Russia, whose vote carries significant political weight, initially opposed the concept of a deadline but now was leaning toward abstaining instead of opposing, the diplomats said on condition of anonymity. China, another important board nation, also was likely to abstain, they said.

The second day of informal talks on how to plumb Iran's nuclear activities continued outside the board meeting after supporters of the deadline asked for more time to get additional backing for their stance.

The meeting, suspended on Wednesday, was expected to reconvene Friday to vote on the timeframe - specifically, a U.S.-backed resolution urging Iran essentially to disprove by October that it has a covert nuclear weapons program.

Implicitly warning that it might severe all ties with the agency, Iran said it would fight any deadline attempt.

"We will oppose that," chief Iranian delegate Ali Akbar Salehi told The Associated Press. "Nobody is in a position to impose a deadline on a sovereign country."

In Sarajevo, the Bosnian capital, Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi said any resolution coming down hard on his country "could make the situation more complicated."

While not outlining consequences, the resolution sets up the possibility of U.N. Security Council involvement. That would happen if the board rules at its November meeting that Iran ignored IAEA demands and was in noncompliance of part of the Nonproliferation Treaty banning the spread of nuclear arms.

The United States had been pushing for a resolution finding Iran in noncompliance at this meeting. But lack of support from most other board members scuttled that plan.

The U.S.-backed push for a deadline got a boost after the head of the IAEA supported it Wednesday, saying he favored "an immediate disclosure of all nuclear activities" on the part of Iran.

Reflecting the concerns driving America and its allies, IAEA Director General Mohammed ElBaradei, in separate comments, warned that he and his agency might soon be unable to verify whether Tehran was diverting nuclear material into a weapons program unless Iran quickly agreed to fully cooperate. Those fears, expressed at a closed session of the board meeting, were relayed by diplomats present.

Before the meeting adjourned, chief U.S. delegate Kenneth Brill called Iran to task based on a report before the board outlining discrepancies between its past statements on its nuclear program and IAEA findings. The report, by ElBaradei, lists the discovery of traces of weapons-grade enriched uranium and other evidence that critics say point to a weapons program.

Tehran insists its programs are for generating electricity and says its equipment was "contaminated" with enriched uranium by a previous owner.

The U.S.-backed draft up for vote Friday expresses "grave concern" that Iran still cannot provide assurances it is not conducting secret nuclear programs more than a year after being called to do so by the IAEA.

It also calls on Iran to "provide accelerated cooperation and full transparency" to allow the agency to clear up Tehran's nuclear question marks.

As well, it urges Iran to make sure there are "no further failures" in reporting obligations and calls on it to "suspend all further uranium enrichment-related activities, including the further introduction of nuclear material" into a facility where IAEA inspectors found traces of the weapons-grade uranium.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: deadline; iaea; iran; nuclear; seccouncil; tehran; un

1 posted on 09/11/2003 4:26:54 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DoctorZIn; nuconvert
ping
2 posted on 09/11/2003 4:27:23 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
ARTICLE SNIPPET: "Iran warned Thursday that it will not accept an October deadline to prove its nuclear aims are peaceful. But support grew at a key U.N. atomic agency meeting for that timeframe, which could set the stage for Security Council action against Tehran."

Well, if Iran doesn't like that deadline --- let US change it. We would like to see your report tomorrow. Wouldn't that be refreshing?
3 posted on 09/11/2003 4:31:27 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Israeli airforce,hey anyone home? Need a missile?
4 posted on 09/11/2003 4:31:39 PM PDT by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Iran warned Thursday that it will not accept an October deadline to prove its nuclear aims are peaceful.

How is it these fools do not recognize we are in NO mood for this crap!

5 posted on 09/11/2003 4:52:13 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
ARTICLE SNIPPET: "Iran warned Thursday that it will not accept an October deadline to prove its nuclear aims are peaceful. But support grew at a key U.N. atomic agency meeting for that timeframe, which could set the stage for Security Council action against Tehran."

Sounds like what Saddam Hussein had to say!

It's been almost 5 months since we used a cruise missle.......the assembly line is still working 3 shifts!

6 posted on 09/11/2003 5:03:48 PM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Fine, and dandy. Prime Minister Sharon, do you have your IDF air component warmed up and in the 'bull pen'? I think you do. Get ready to target and pull the trigger. A night raid would be spectacular, by the way. It would give the CNN cameras something to shoot.
7 posted on 09/11/2003 5:16:15 PM PDT by timydnuc (FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson