[goldstategop]

Hey I agree with you. Now how do we get the message out what with the libs spending over $4 million to get Prop. 54 buried?

[rdf]

Glad you agree ... I knew you did! :)

Now, how to help 54.

Well, the usual ways are open to us. Letters to the editor, contributions made through Ward's site, talk radio, this forum, etc.

I have been drawing attention to the issue, since I see it as a "Declaration Issue," at my foundation's site, www.declaration.net

And, though I know you're leaning strongly to A.S. as the electable guy, as long as Mcclintock stays in the race and keeps rising, and as long as he highlights his support for 54, and Arnold's rather arrogant and dismissive opposition, 54 gets free media that way.

We must not lose heart.

The latest polls had 54 ahead by about 10%, and 227, Unz's initiative won handily in 1998, though outspent by guys like Bustamante nearly 10-1.

In the end, the voters decide, and I'm hoping they'll do the right thing.

Cheers,

Richard F.

[Coeur de Lion]

The reason I inadvertently re-posted this article was driven by my anger at two editorials in the LA Times regarding Prop 54. The most recent was one by George Skelton taday. Both implied that this information needs to be gathered because it may show evidence of racial discrimination. It's this pre-supposition which is the major reason this information shouldn't be gather. Not because of the data but the fact that it's continually misused to prove that any discrepancies between different races and ethnicities are a result of discrimination.