Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: We’re Winning This War
The Spectator ^ | September 13, 2003 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 09/11/2003 10:03:49 AM PDT by quidnunc

The remarkable achievements of the Bush administration, and his enemies’ remarkable refusal to give him credit

The emergency dispatcher wasn’t quite sure she’d heard correctly. ‘Sir, you have what jumping from buildings?’ ‘People. Bodies are just coming from out of the sky… .’

On a day like 11 September 2001, time is both accelerated and suspended. On the top floors of the World Trade Center, office workers who moments earlier had been scheduling lunch appointments and making plans for the weekend had a few seconds to determine the manner of their death — to stay and be burned alive, or to take one last gulp of fresh air as they plunged to the plaza below. For almost everybody else, time is halted: when you’re caught up in the middle of a terrible day, you don’t know that that’s what it is — a day. By 11 o’clock on that Tuesday morning, with the second tower collapsed and the Pentagon on fire and rumours of more missing planes and the White House evacuated, none of us knew how much more was to come. I don’t think you could find many Americans who went to bed that night expecting to get through the next two years without another major terrorist attack on US soil. Yet here we are.

That in itself is remarkable. Even more remarkable is the lack of credit that the Bush administration gets for it.

There are basically two lines on Bush these days. At home, the media and the Democrats argue that Americans are somehow reeling under a terrorist onslaught. As the New York Times’s elderly schoolgirl Maureen Dowd put it last week, ‘We wanted to get rid of Osama and Saddam and the Taleban and al-Qa’eda. We didn’t. They’re replicating and coming at us like cockroaches.’ Really? Osama is replicating? That’s news to me. Considering that the original hasn’t been seen in a year and three quarters, it looks more like he’s plicated. I said in these pages 15 months ago that he’s dead, he’s bin Laden to rest, he’s pushing up daisy-cutters, and I’m sticking with that.

Meanwhile, in Europe, the tinfoil-hat brigade has gone mainstream. Of course America hasn’t been attacked again. That’s because 9/11 was a neocon conspiracy to give Washington a pretext to grab Iraq’s oil and Afghanistan’s, er, rubble. The conspirazoids now include the Rt Hon Michael Meacher, MP, a man who until a few weeks ago was one of Her Majesty’s ministers of state, a fellow who sat at the Cabinet table with Tony Blair and discussed troop deployments. But now, with time on his hands, he’s frolicking merrily on the wilder shores of the Internet. In the Guardian on Saturday, he demanded to know whether US air-security operations had ‘been deliberately stood down on 11 September’ in order to facilitate the attack. Who would do such a thing? Why, Rummy, Cheney, Wolfie and the other sinister graduates of the Project for a New American Century.

Meacher is late to the Mad Hatter’s tea party. I’ve had a gazillion emails a day about this for almost two years. Condi Rice apparently warned all kinds of people not to fly on 11 September. If that’s true, it seems odd that Don Rumsfeld, one of the architects of the conspiracy, didn’t warn himself not to go to the Pentagon that morning. You’d think, being in on the plot, he’d warn himself not to be sitting at his desk as the plane sliced through the building. If Michael Meacher had had advance warning that a plane was going to slam into the Department of the Environment that day, would he have had the cojones to be sitting there dictating a memo to Miss Jones as the nose cone ploughed into the photocopier? Or maybe that’s just how well planned the conspiracy was: Rumsfeld knew the plane would hit the other side of the Pentagon well away from his office, so, if he coolly went to work as usual, he’d throw even expert conspiracy-sniffers like Meacher off the scent. Or maybe there was no Pentagon plane at all; it was a pure invention of the administration, as that French bestseller argued. Or maybe the Pentagon itself is just a thought-form generated by the microchip implanted in Meacher’s brain when he sat next to Dick Cheney at a G7 buffet lunch. Or maybe… .

Looking back at the columns I wrote in the first days after 9/11, I’m pleasantly surprised by how perceptive they were on the self-loathing of the West, the uselessness of the Cold War alliances, the duplicitousness of America’s ‘moderate’ Arab ‘friends’, etc. But I seriously underestimated the degree to which much of Europe would be unhinged by 11 September. If it’s a choice between Meacher or the Continentals who’ve turned down US requests for troop contributions because they want Iraq to go belly up so that Bush gets defeated in 2004 and some wimp Democrat gets elected who’ll treat them with the respect they deserve, I’ll take the latter. Chirac’s decayed cynicism is marginally less unmoored from reality.

But, as the descent into madness of Mr Meacher illustrates, there’s no longer any agreement on what reality is. Last Sunday, the Observer ran a story headlined ‘Bush Seeks An Exit Strategy As War Threatens His Career’: ‘The President will make a dramatic U-turn on Iraq in a TV broadcast tonight to try to salvage his hopes of re-election amid Americans’ growing hostility to the casualties and chaos …approval ratings plummeting …another Vietnam …sons and daughters dying daily …bogged down… .’

Did Bush seek an exit strategy? Did he make a dramatic U-turn? Au contraire. ‘We have carried the fight to the enemy,’ he said. ‘The surest way to avoid attacks on our own people is to engage the enemy where he lives and plans. We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan today so that we do not meet him again on our own streets, in our own cities.’

Are America’s sons and daughters dying daily in guerrilla attacks? No. As I write, no American serviceman has died in Iraq for nine days. Whatever that is, it’s not Vietnam.

Are Bush’s approval ratings plummeting? Gallup has him at 59 per cent. In any case, he always takes August off and his numbers always slip as noisy Democrats run around filling the vacuum. Then September arrives, he comes back to work and they rise again. It’s now an established seasonal variation.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2ndanniversary; marksteyn; marksteynlist; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: B.Bumbleberry
>>>The invasion of Iraq is attracting the deadheads ... <<<

Maybe they heard Jerry Garcia was spotted there.

.
.
.
.
Along with Elvis and bin Laden
21 posted on 09/11/2003 10:42:16 AM PDT by MalcolmS (Oh, you mean "dead enders", to quote Mr. Rumsfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Mark Steyn Scores Again!
22 posted on 09/11/2003 10:48:26 AM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MalcolmS
Lol. I haven't followed those groups enough to appreciate the significance of what I was typing. Apologies to all Dead enthusiasts.
23 posted on 09/11/2003 10:49:55 AM PDT by B.Bumbleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
...the awesome divide between the postmodern sophists and everybody else is the real legacy of 11 September.

Let us hope so. And may that "awesome divide" between the self-selected elite chattering classes -- including the "nine dwarves" hoping for President Bush's job in 2004 -- and sane, reasonable human beings grow wider still, to the point where said elite can be clearly recognized displaying itself in the public square, in the full light of day, as the arrogant, irrational, self-loathing, and America-hating irrelevancies they all truly are. Truly, "the Emperor has no clothes"....

And thus, God willing, the innocent lost ones of 9/11 will not have died in vain.

Thanks for the great post, quidnunc. I love Mark Steyn.

24 posted on 09/11/2003 10:52:15 AM PDT by betty boop (God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world. -- Paul Dirac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
<< Excerpted - click for full article ^ >>

Why?

Are you getting kickbacks for any hits on your link?

[Don't hold your breath, then]
25 posted on 09/11/2003 10:58:38 AM PDT by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Thank you.
26 posted on 09/11/2003 11:00:59 AM PDT by Brian Allen ( Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse
"All turban and no jihad" Classic

Clever line, but I don't think the Moorags are called "turbans". Isn't that a Sikh/Hindu thing?

To be accurate, Moorags are best called "Dishtowl-and-a-fanbelt".

27 posted on 09/11/2003 11:03:31 AM PDT by Hank Rearden (Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Cuttnhorse
"All turban and no jihad" Classic

Agreed! I will have to remember that one!

29 posted on 09/11/2003 11:23:42 AM PDT by cmak9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seamole
They should post that "Excerpted"- thingie at the top, that way one could choose whether to read the excerpted version or not.
30 posted on 09/11/2003 11:29:52 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: seamole
seamole wrote: As much as I would prefer quidnunc not to excerpt, and as much as I know that quidnunc's legal interpretation is absolutely wrong, under current forum rules he does have the right to post any article as an excerpt if he so chooses. Just as the rest of us have the right to post the full text of articles as thread comments (except when sourced from LAT/WP and related publications). Fortunately, the vast majority of FReepers hold the correct interpretation of copyright law and the right priorities when it comes to choosing whether to excerpt.

There are a million reasons why my interpretation of copyright law is correct and the interpretation generally accepted here on Free Republic is wrong — and each one of those reasons is preceeded by a "$."

31 posted on 09/11/2003 11:58:45 AM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Even in the Hindu Kush at the all-U-can-eat scorpion buffet, you can’t dine out on 9/11 for ever.

ROTFL!!! That is just PRICELESS!!

32 posted on 09/11/2003 12:19:13 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Those people deserve the courtesy of a page-view hit.

That's fair enough.

33 posted on 09/11/2003 12:20:23 PM PDT by jokar (Beware the White European Male Christian theological complex !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ; diotima
Steyn Ping
34 posted on 09/11/2003 12:35:47 PM PDT by Feiny (We Will Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: quidnunc; hchutch; Chancellor Palpatine
Are Bush’s approval ratings plummeting? Gallup has him at 59 per cent. In any case, he always takes August off and his numbers always slip as noisy Democrats run around filling the vacuum. Then September arrives, he comes back to work and they rise again. It’s now an established seasonal variation.

Daschle and paleocons "deeply saddened."

36 posted on 09/11/2003 12:49:10 PM PDT by Poohbah (Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Classic Steyn. As someone said in a different thread, Lileks and Steyn, a great one - two punch.
37 posted on 09/11/2003 12:57:57 PM PDT by Corporate Law (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Dang, Steyn is good.
38 posted on 09/11/2003 1:01:26 PM PDT by colorado tanker (USA - taking out the world's trash since 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Best line:

"And does Miss Hawley really think Saddam is ‘gloating’ right now? His dynastic ambitions died with his sons, he’s kipping at the back of his second cousin’s donkey stall, and he’d kill for a new box of Quality Street but George Galloway’s nowhere in sight."

39 posted on 09/11/2003 1:12:56 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Bush wins in 2004. I'll take any bet the Bush-haters want to offer me. Name your amount.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Dawg
he’d kill for a new box of Quality Street but George Galloway’s nowhere in sight

Tex, I'll be honest with ya. I don't have a clue what that means.

40 posted on 09/11/2003 1:20:25 PM PDT by colorado tanker (USA - taking out the world's trash since 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson