Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Truck conflict expands (Bush) Administration asks for high court's help on Mexican vehicles

Posted on 09/10/2003 9:58:26 PM PDT by lewislynn

HoustonChronicle.com -- http://www.HoustonChronicle.com | Section: Business


Sept. 10, 2003, 11:21PM

Truck conflict expands

Administration asks for high court's help on Mexican vehicles

Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration has requested the Supreme Court's help in a fight over allowing Mexican trucks and buses on U.S. roadways for the first time in two decades.

The administration wants to drop a court-ordered environmental study that has delayed the border opening. The $1.8 million study is expected to take a year or more.

President Bush ordered U.S. highways open to Mexican trucks last fall, despite long-standing opposition from U.S. labor, consumer and environmental organizations.

The consumer group Public Citizen, the Teamsters and others sued on safety and environmental grounds, and a federal appeals court ruled earlier this year that the government must perform the lengthy study.

The Bush administration has said it will comply with that order but also filed an appeal with the Supreme Court.

"The court of appeals misapplied the nation's environmental laws and constrained the president's discretion to conduct foreign affairs," Solicitor General Theodore Olson wrote.

The ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals "prevents the president's action from taking effect and thereby hampers commerce," Olson wrote in the appeal filed this week.

The ruling also needlessly prolongs a trade dispute with Mexico over the requirements of the North American Free Trade Agreement, Olson wrote.

Public Citizen plans to tell the court not to waste its time, its president, Joan Claybrook, said.

"They're beating a dead horse," she said of the Bush administration. "They didn't do an environmental impact study, and they should have. There are significant environmental issues here, and if they'd done it right the first time they wouldn't have to be in court."

The study will analyze short- and long-term environmental effects of opening U.S. roads to Mexican trucks. It will not stop Mexican trucks from operating in the long run but should lessen potentially harmful effects, Claybrook said.

Since 1982, trucks from Mexico have been allowed only in approximately 20-mile-wide commercial border zones, where Mexican rigs must transfer their cargo to U.S. trucks for deliveries within the United States.

Mexican trucks make about 4.5 million border crossings every year, and it is cumbersome and expensive to offload cargo to U.S. trucks, the administration filing said.

"Passengers using scheduled bus services must follow similarly inefficient procedures," Olson wrote.

Mexico claims the moratorium has cost it more than $2 billion.

Public Citizen says Mexican trucks are typically older and more polluting than American trucks.

After Bush's order, the Transportation Department received scores of applications from Mexican carriers and bus companies, but none is yet operating in the United States.

Under NAFTA, Mexican trucks were to have gained full access to U.S. roads beginning in 2000. But the Clinton administration, under pressure from labor and consumer groups, refused to grant them entry. Mexico successfully challenged the moratorium through a free-trade tribunal.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Mexico
KEYWORDS: freetrade; mexicantrucking; nafta

1 posted on 09/10/2003 9:58:26 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Governor Bustamante will help....
2 posted on 09/10/2003 10:05:22 PM PDT by Partisan Hack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
President Bush ordered U.S. highways open to Mexican trucks last fall...

Anybody know why?

3 posted on 09/10/2003 10:06:56 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
I hate to disagree with "W", but if we let those rattle traps on our highways it will be far more dangerous than it is now. The highway patrol will have to spend all of their time doing vehicle inspections and then impounding them.

Do you think those guys will be keeping log books and pulling over to get enough sleep to drive. Nope. They'll be worse than U.S. drivers that fudge to make more money. At least U.S. drivers overall do a pretty good job of being safe. Why would we want to open the interior of the U.S. to drivers and truck/buses from Mexico. It's just going to end up taking more jobs and making the U.S. smell like PEMEX gas. I ain't no tree hugger, but that crap is nasty!

I don't much care if it's costing Mexico as it now stands, what will it cost us if it's allowed? Something is wrong with this open borders mentality!

4 posted on 09/10/2003 10:14:23 PM PDT by Tactical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tactical
I don't understand why Bush is so pro-Mexico that he encourages amnesty and opening our borders. NAFTA was an attempt to treat Mexico the same as Canada, but while Canada keeps leaning toward socialism, at least they are not an impoverished, third world country like Mexico.

I am very much afraid that Bush is going to loose a lot of his core supporters if he continues to take steps that dissolve our southern border.

5 posted on 09/10/2003 10:27:00 PM PDT by bjcintennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Partisan Hack
Governor Bustamante will help....

Along with President Dean....

6 posted on 09/10/2003 10:27:41 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
Anybody know why?

C-o-r-p-o-r-a-t-i-o-n-s

7 posted on 09/10/2003 10:37:18 PM PDT by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
I guess everything is for sale.
8 posted on 09/10/2003 10:45:03 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
and the hispanic vote.
9 posted on 09/10/2003 10:54:45 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
N A F T A

Any other questions? This 30,000 plus page travesty wasn't even read by 95% plus of the public officials who voted for it.

I believe it was Bob Dole who bragged about not reading it.
10 posted on 09/10/2003 11:12:47 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
EVERY politician who supported NAFTA ought to be charged with treason for undermining the security of the borders of the U.S. of A.And for tossing aside the Constitutional means of federal taxes,tariffs.

Pigs will fly first.

11 posted on 09/11/2003 2:34:29 AM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham
Agreed, on both counts. I had to reign my comments back in. Nothing upsets me more than parceling out our sovereignty.
12 posted on 09/11/2003 2:37:50 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
Related thread for those interested:

Bush seeks court's help on Mexican trucks

13 posted on 09/11/2003 4:18:10 PM PDT by Fraulein (TCB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Well, I knew we'd find consensus on something. Bump!
14 posted on 09/11/2003 4:26:22 PM PDT by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
lol
15 posted on 09/11/2003 4:27:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn
The truck drivers better get ready to be "retrained" for a better job, in keeping with the new global economy./sarcasm

Looks like another American industry goes down the sewer.
16 posted on 09/11/2003 4:43:39 PM PDT by EagleMamaMT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bjcintennessee
I don't understand why Bush is so pro-Mexico

Could it be that it's profitable for business to hire Mexicans at lower wages? That means more profit. It's all short term gains, anyway.

None of these people really seem to care that, like slavery in America, it's going to blow up in our faces in 100 years.

17 posted on 09/11/2003 5:27:12 PM PDT by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson