Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reagan Man
While there is definitely a cadre of cheap shot artists supporting Arnold and attacking Tom on these threads, there is an even larger and vociferous group of spammers who throw every dirty smear at Arnold on these threads. Give a a bad and false impression of who are really supporting McClintock.
151 posted on 09/10/2003 6:54:31 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat
There is an equally loud and vociferous bunch that slander Tom at every opportunity and I have never once read that they give Arnold a bad name. They are just a$$holes. As are the obnoxious Tom supporters. All of them are repeat performers. And all give FreeRepublic a bad name. Especially when insulting personal comments are made - either about the candidate or the poster.
174 posted on 09/10/2003 7:07:59 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: Diddle E. Squat
There are always "spammers" on FR. But after the last two weeks, its obvious who the disruptors are and who the anti-McClintock attack dogs are.

Too many FReepers come up with the same old blame game antics, while they ignore the real trashtalking FReepers who can't find anything to do, but ridicule McClintock. Meanwhile, their guy is not geting the job done. He won't even debate his opponents. That clearly shows a lack of confidence on Arnold's part and it isn't gonna get any better for him either.

178 posted on 09/10/2003 7:08:47 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson