[ambrose]

Are you somehow involved with the ACLU case being heard tomorrow, as some have indicated?

Nah, just some Arnold trolls trying to piss me off so I'll hit them back, so they can then go slam on the abuse button... not falling for it...

[onyx]

Oh, how I hate having my integrity challenged and being called an Arnold TROLL by a LIAR I can prove is lying using his own post! Hint, I'm talking to and about you, Ambrose.

You cut and pasted BonnieJ's question to you as follows: Are you somehow involved with the ACLU case being heard tomorrow, as some have indicated?

Ambrose's answer: "Nah, just some Arnold trolls trying to piss me off so I'll hit them back, so they can then go slam on the abuse button... not falling for it... "

_________________________________________________________

EXPLAIN THIS POST BELOW, Ambrose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To: ALOHA RONNIE

From: http://electionlaw.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_electionlaw_archive.html#106254074318602140

anel set in ACLU punch card case The punch card case has been assigned to three Ninth Circuit judges viewed as liberals---Paez, Pregerson, and Thomas. Oral argument is 10 am September 11 in Pasadena. (Disclosure: I filed an amicus brief supporting the ACLU in this case.)

12 posted on 09/06/2003 12:07 AM PDT by ambrose (Fight The Real Enemy...) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---------------------------------------------------------

So tell us, Ambrose, were you lying to BonnieJ or to Aloha Ronnie, or does lying just come natural to you?