[onyx]

Oh, how I hate having my integrity challenged and being called an Arnold TROLL by a LIAR I can prove is lying using his own post! Hint, I'm talking to and about you, Ambrose.

You cut and pasted BonnieJ's question to you as follows: Are you somehow involved with the ACLU case being heard tomorrow, as some have indicated?

Ambrose's answer: "Nah, just some Arnold trolls trying to piss me off so I'll hit them back, so they can then go slam on the abuse button... not falling for it... "

_________________________________________________________

EXPLAIN THIS POST BELOW, Ambrose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To: ALOHA RONNIE

From: http://electionlaw.blogspot.com/2003_09_01_electionlaw_archive.html#106254074318602140

anel set in ACLU punch card case The punch card case has been assigned to three Ninth Circuit judges viewed as liberals---Paez, Pregerson, and Thomas. Oral argument is 10 am September 11 in Pasadena. (Disclosure: I filed an amicus brief supporting the ACLU in this case.)

12 posted on 09/06/2003 12:07 AM PDT by ambrose (Fight The Real Enemy...) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---------------------------------------------------------

So tell us, Ambrose, were you lying to BonnieJ or to Aloha Ronnie, or does lying just come natural to you?

[Chancellor Palpatine]

You got some 'splainin' to do, it looks like.

[Tamzee]

This should be interesting :-)

[DoughtyOne]

...on behalf of the ACLU. And THIS is the guy who has been flitting around the forum on behalf of McClintock trashing everyone in sight for not being conservative enough?

[BibChr]

A scorched-earther too pure to vote for (one) imperfect candidate (-- because he favors another imperfect candidate), lying? Siding with the ACLU?

Bumfuzzling.

Dan