To: Mr Rogers
My first choice is McClintock, but I will certainly not do anything that would help Davis stay in office, or elect Bustamante. The failed policies of the Democrats in office are the only reasons we are debating this, is it your wish for this to continue?
To: woodyinscc
I guess I'm wondering what electing Arnold would change. I'm sure Arnold is more honest than Davis or Buste, and he might be less likely to raise taxes. But I keep waiting for Arnold to come out swinging for something I believe in. And I'm not hearing much.
Since I'm military and residing in the state against my wishes, I can't vote anyways...although I pay a ton of taxes to california. But if y'all want to convince McClintock supporters to vote for Arnold, you need to try something more positvie than, "He isn't as awful as Buste!"
See Dan's response above, and check out his link. It actually offers a few reasons FOR supporting Arnold. The McClintock supporters I meet aren't going to be swayed by, "Hold your nose and vote for Arnold". Nor will they be swayed by, "You idiots! What if Buste wins?" They might, however, be swayed by rational discussions on what (few) positive things can be said about Arnold.
If you want to blow off steam, feel free to call McClintock supporters idiots. If you want to change someone's mind, start thinking about reasons to vote FOR Arnold.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson