To: smiley
Because the active-duty Army cannot maintain an occupation force above 60,000 beyond March - according to the Congressional Budgeting Office... We don't have enough soldiers..
6 posted on
09/10/2003 6:08:06 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
Bingo. I've heard specualtion that part of the $87 billion Bush is asking for would go to re-activate a couple of Army divisions, and maybe a few AF fighter wings. Have you heard anything that coroborates this? I hope it's true...that's something Bush should have pushed for starting on 9-12.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
8 posted on
09/10/2003 6:14:44 AM PDT by
wku man
(Buccaneers 17, Eagles 0!!!! What do you have to say now, Stallone and Madden?)
To: AntiGuv
JR, do you still see a full capitulation regarding demands for UN political control of Iraq-- replacing Bremmer?
To: AntiGuv
Because the active-duty Army cannot maintain an occupation force above 60,000 beyond March
Why not? Don't tell me clintack did SO much damage?
20 posted on
09/10/2003 7:10:29 AM PDT by
Cronos
('slam and sanity don't mix, ask your Imam.....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson