To: CdMGuy
You're entitled to your opinion. Here's mine.
"I like smoke free air." is not a justification of taking away a bar owner's property rights. It is his establishment, bottom line, and he invites guests into it. He pays the bills. Neither the guests nor the government should have any say in whether or not people smoke.
If that upsets you, voice your opinion with your feet. If you like smoke free air, go to restaurants that maintain that environment. If enough people agree with you, those sorts of establishments will become more common.
Also, whether or not you find the habit "filthy and unhealthful" is irrelevant. "Smoking is icky" is not justification for taking away property rights. Again, if you don't like it, stay away from these types of people.
It is not, nor should it have ever been, the government's job to adapt the world to suit you.
43 posted on
09/08/2003 7:07:00 PM PDT by
FLAMING DEATH
(Why do I carry a .45? Because they don't make a .46!)
To: FLAMING DEATH
Under your vague difinition of Property Rights, a tavern owner would have the right to spread the SARS virus in his bar. Sorry, smoking has nothing to do with property rights. It is a public health issue.
48 posted on
09/08/2003 11:00:55 PM PDT by
CdMGuy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson