Skip to comments.
His Side: Father Spends 3 Months in Jail for
Returning Phone Call
His Side with Glenn Sacks ^
| 9/7/03
| Glenn Sacks
Posted on 09/08/2003 12:21:38 PM PDT by PercivalWalks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: PercivalWalks
if anyone else wants to hear a horror stort freep mail me and I will send my appeal document- you will be stunned.
2
posted on
09/08/2003 12:27:49 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
To: PercivalWalks
This is typical for Massachusetts. A co-worker of mine went through this hell a few years ago. A police officer actually visited the schoolteacher of this guy's kid and told her that if he attempted to contact her for any reason (including how his son was doing in school) that she should contact the police immediately. When the mess got straightened out later (the charges of physical abuse were "dropped" by the wife), the father felt like a criminal going to the next school open house.
It is a common tactic here for women to charge the husband with physical abuse and then drop the charges later in exchange for a divorce settlement that is advantageous to the wife. (As if they need the cards stacked in their favor even more.)
3
posted on
09/08/2003 12:28:39 PM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(Back in boot camp! 224.2 (-75.8))
To: SamAdams76
Stories like this lend a certain irony to the notion of queers wanting to be married and play house, doesn't it?
To: PercivalWalks
A friend of mine got a restraining order on him from a false
report filed by his wife when she threw him out for cheating.
A couple weeks later she calls begging him to come back and
come over. A few minutes after arriving at his former home
the police showed up to escort him to prison for a year.
Beware, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned and backed by
a clueless government.
5
posted on
09/08/2003 12:33:54 PM PDT
by
PaxMacian
To: SamAdams76
"It is a common tactic here for women to charge the husband with physical abuse and then drop the charges later in exchange for a divorce settlement that is advantageous to the wife. "
I think that happens everywhere.
6
posted on
09/08/2003 12:34:09 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
To: PercivalWalks
bump
7
posted on
09/08/2003 12:37:13 PM PDT
by
agarrett
To: Mr. K
I have a Niece who is extraordinarily pretty. In some ways she is ok but she has taken her husbands to the cleaners in really dishonorable ways.
She left her first husband and her second one, getting custody of the children plus alimony and child support. She then married a very wealthy one and got him to adopt her children. Her ex's agreed to this to get rid of the high child support. She then left the rich one and has him paying really high child support plus alimony.
She plain and simply has used her looks to rob her husbands.
8
posted on
09/08/2003 12:38:37 PM PDT
by
yarddog
To: PercivalWalks
Stories like this are one of the reasons I'm glad that divorce is against my wife and I's religion.
9
posted on
09/08/2003 12:39:29 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: PaxMacian
Beware, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned and backed by a clueless government.The government isn't clueless. They made the system to be this way by design. It's all about how much incentive they can give a woman to turn spiteful and so the state can exert more control over more people. Lots of government jobs and business for members of the Bar, who write the laws they benefit from financially.
10
posted on
09/08/2003 12:41:17 PM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: PercivalWalks
One aspect of restraining orders that rarely gets addressed, is the fact that the woman is not constrained by them. The man cannot go within certain distances of her or the children. He cannot contact them in any manner. However, if the little dear wants to contact the man, she can. She can send him mail, e-mail, phone him and do just about anything else she wants to.
My former wife obtained a restraining order on me. She kicked me out of a home that was registered in my name. After that she thought nothing of calling me and asking me to do favors for her that would bring me into her presence in clear violation of the restraining order. Clearly the woman had nothing to fear, but the manipulation of the courts was quite successful. It facilitated her abandonment of our 13 and 14 year old children every night and every weekend, as she proceeded to shack up with her boyfriend at another location.
To: yarddog
I have a Niece who is extraordinarily pretty. In some ways she is ok but she has taken her husbands to the cleaners in really dishonorable ways. She left her first husband and her second one, getting custody of the children plus alimony and child support. She then married a very wealthy one and got him to adopt her children. Her ex's agreed to this to get rid of the high child support. She then left the rich one and has him paying really high child support plus alimony.
She plain and simply has used her looks to rob her husbands.
Sooooo.....
..... can I get an introduction?
12
posted on
09/08/2003 12:44:30 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: PercivalWalks
This is further evidence that not all homicides are crimes.
To: yarddog
She plain and simply has used her looks to rob her husbands.More accurately, she used HER CHILDREN to rob her husbands. The good looks was just what she used to get the men interested. Alimony is small potatos because not many women get it and it's deductable for the men. But children are used to plunder and control men in way that would make Stalin dance a jog of glee.
I long for a day when people who exploit kids like that end up in 1930's style chain gangs, but the people who write the laws use kids as much as anyone else, so it will never happen.
14
posted on
09/08/2003 12:48:41 PM PDT
by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
To: Lazamataz
She is now married again. This time to the Sheriff's Brother.
Actually this one might last. They have been married several years and her looks are starting to fade.
15
posted on
09/08/2003 12:49:57 PM PDT
by
yarddog
To: PercivalWalks
I had a restraining order against me during my divorce.
My ex found a lover during our 10 year marriage. I became depressed and she was "afraid of me".
I was threatened with jail for leaving her a message at work telling her to change the contact phone number for her cell phone account.
She moved in with her boyfriend but, since Illinois is no fault, being depressed about adultery became my fault.
Judgement Day is going to make for some interesting stories from lawyers.
To: yarddog
and her looks are starting to fade.Oh, I'm sorry, I have to go now.
17
posted on
09/08/2003 12:55:30 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: wideawake
I do so agree. I told my hubby that we are in this for the long haul, so if you think divorce is an option, think again. He will not get out of it before my little one is 18. (this was before we were married)
I think that "Friend of the Court" is a bunch of extortionists wanting to break up families to keep the money rolling in.
18
posted on
09/08/2003 12:56:10 PM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(I've abandoned my search for truth - Now looking for a good fantasy.)
To: Lazamataz
We missed ya, Laz!
19
posted on
09/08/2003 12:57:13 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: wideawake
We missed ya, Laz!Next time, use a flatter-trajectory bullet.
20
posted on
09/08/2003 12:59:51 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson