Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

His Side: Father Spends 3 Months in Jail for Returning Phone Call
His Side with Glenn Sacks ^ | 9/7/03 | Glenn Sacks

Posted on 09/08/2003 12:21:38 PM PDT by PercivalWalks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 09/08/2003 12:21:38 PM PDT by PercivalWalks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
if anyone else wants to hear a horror stort freep mail me and I will send my appeal document- you will be stunned.
2 posted on 09/08/2003 12:27:49 PM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
This is typical for Massachusetts. A co-worker of mine went through this hell a few years ago. A police officer actually visited the schoolteacher of this guy's kid and told her that if he attempted to contact her for any reason (including how his son was doing in school) that she should contact the police immediately. When the mess got straightened out later (the charges of physical abuse were "dropped" by the wife), the father felt like a criminal going to the next school open house.

It is a common tactic here for women to charge the husband with physical abuse and then drop the charges later in exchange for a divorce settlement that is advantageous to the wife. (As if they need the cards stacked in their favor even more.)

3 posted on 09/08/2003 12:28:39 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (Back in boot camp! 224.2 (-75.8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Stories like this lend a certain irony to the notion of queers wanting to be married and play house, doesn't it?
4 posted on 09/08/2003 12:33:22 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
A friend of mine got a restraining order on him from a false
report filed by his wife when she threw him out for cheating.
A couple weeks later she calls begging him to come back and
come over. A few minutes after arriving at his former home
the police showed up to escort him to prison for a year.
Beware, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned and backed by
a clueless government.
5 posted on 09/08/2003 12:33:54 PM PDT by PaxMacian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
"It is a common tactic here for women to charge the husband with physical abuse and then drop the charges later in exchange for a divorce settlement that is advantageous to the wife. "

I think that happens everywhere.
6 posted on 09/08/2003 12:34:09 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
bump
7 posted on 09/08/2003 12:37:13 PM PDT by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
I have a Niece who is extraordinarily pretty. In some ways she is ok but she has taken her husbands to the cleaners in really dishonorable ways.

She left her first husband and her second one, getting custody of the children plus alimony and child support. She then married a very wealthy one and got him to adopt her children. Her ex's agreed to this to get rid of the high child support. She then left the rich one and has him paying really high child support plus alimony.

She plain and simply has used her looks to rob her husbands.

8 posted on 09/08/2003 12:38:37 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
Stories like this are one of the reasons I'm glad that divorce is against my wife and I's religion.
9 posted on 09/08/2003 12:39:29 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PaxMacian
Beware, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned and backed by a clueless government.

The government isn't clueless. They made the system to be this way by design. It's all about how much incentive they can give a woman to turn spiteful and so the state can exert more control over more people. Lots of government jobs and business for members of the Bar, who write the laws they benefit from financially.

10 posted on 09/08/2003 12:41:17 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
One aspect of restraining orders that rarely gets addressed, is the fact that the woman is not constrained by them.  The man cannot go within certain distances of her or the children.  He cannot contact them in any manner.  However, if the little dear wants to contact the man, she can.  She can send him mail, e-mail, phone him and do just about anything else she wants to.

My former wife obtained a restraining order on me.  She kicked me out of a home that was registered in my name.  After that she thought nothing of calling me and asking me to do favors for her that would bring me into her presence in clear violation of the restraining order.  Clearly the woman had nothing to fear, but the manipulation of the courts was quite successful.  It facilitated her abandonment of our 13 and 14 year old children every night and every weekend, as she proceeded to shack up with her boyfriend at another location.

11 posted on 09/08/2003 12:43:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
I have a Niece who is extraordinarily pretty. In some ways she is ok but she has taken her husbands to the cleaners in really dishonorable ways.

She left her first husband and her second one, getting custody of the children plus alimony and child support. She then married a very wealthy one and got him to adopt her children. Her ex's agreed to this to get rid of the high child support. She then left the rich one and has him paying really high child support plus alimony.

She plain and simply has used her looks to rob her husbands.

Sooooo.....

..... can I get an introduction?

12 posted on 09/08/2003 12:44:30 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
This is further evidence that not all homicides are crimes.
13 posted on 09/08/2003 12:44:55 PM PDT by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
She plain and simply has used her looks to rob her husbands.

More accurately, she used HER CHILDREN to rob her husbands. The good looks was just what she used to get the men interested. Alimony is small potatos because not many women get it and it's deductable for the men. But children are used to plunder and control men in way that would make Stalin dance a jog of glee.

I long for a day when people who exploit kids like that end up in 1930's style chain gangs, but the people who write the laws use kids as much as anyone else, so it will never happen.

14 posted on 09/08/2003 12:48:41 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
She is now married again. This time to the Sheriff's Brother.

Actually this one might last. They have been married several years and her looks are starting to fade.

15 posted on 09/08/2003 12:49:57 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PercivalWalks
I had a restraining order against me during my divorce.
My ex found a lover during our 10 year marriage. I became depressed and she was "afraid of me".
I was threatened with jail for leaving her a message at work telling her to change the contact phone number for her cell phone account.
She moved in with her boyfriend but, since Illinois is no fault, being depressed about adultery became my fault.
Judgement Day is going to make for some interesting stories from lawyers.
16 posted on 09/08/2003 12:51:49 PM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
and her looks are starting to fade.

Oh, I'm sorry, I have to go now.

17 posted on 09/08/2003 12:55:30 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I do so agree. I told my hubby that we are in this for the long haul, so if you think divorce is an option, think again. He will not get out of it before my little one is 18. (this was before we were married)
I think that "Friend of the Court" is a bunch of extortionists wanting to break up families to keep the money rolling in.
18 posted on 09/08/2003 12:56:10 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I've abandoned my search for truth - Now looking for a good fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
We missed ya, Laz!
19 posted on 09/08/2003 12:57:13 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
We missed ya, Laz!

Next time, use a flatter-trajectory bullet.

20 posted on 09/08/2003 12:59:51 PM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson