Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Department Gives Green Light to Hillary Accuser
NewsMax.com ^ | 9/07/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 09/07/2003 10:51:58 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: kattracks
If either one of these men die.. this is going to be too dang freaky. God protect them both. I'm serious.
21 posted on 09/07/2003 12:14:41 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Hopefully he has sent "to be opened in case of my death" packets to several individuals/entities.
22 posted on 09/07/2003 12:31:46 PM PDT by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"Paul's extradition to the U.S. is set for Sept. 12 - "if he lives that long," says the Post. "

"Payback's a bitch... witch. :) "

is vegas giving "odds"???

23 posted on 09/07/2003 12:54:19 PM PDT by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Does anyone else smell the Clintons involvment somewhere here? Why would this guy be moved to a death row type of facility?

The Bush Administration should know by now that the Clintons do business like the terrorists. No one is left alive.
24 posted on 09/07/2003 1:13:20 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Judicial Watch complained to the Justice Department last week that Paul's life was now in danger."

By design no doubt. They'd better expedite his extradition and keep him under a 24/7 armed guard or he will not live to tell what he knows. I would love to see that wicked b*tch taken down, the more publicly the better, but I'm not going to get my hopes up too much. She knows people in low places and there has yet to be anyone who knows anything about the dirty doings of the Clintons who hasn't either been bought off or turned up dead.

25 posted on 09/07/2003 1:23:33 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Peter Paul will never make it to the witness stand alive.

Dead men tell no tales.

It is almost more than just a coincidence that the trail of bodies lying on the Clintons tracks is so vast.

26 posted on 09/07/2003 1:25:29 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Does ANYONE have a photo of this Peter Paul? Can it be posted?
A long time ago I knew someone with that name.
27 posted on 09/07/2003 1:28:56 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
I have a list, but I did not keep the link. It is several pages.
28 posted on 09/07/2003 1:30:11 PM PDT by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
Sooner or later at least SOME of the residual evil and damning evidence about those 8 years of amorality in the White House will emerge and doom the hopes and dreams of the Hillary/Bubba sycophants pining for a return of Clintonism. They are like a slime that oozes through the cracks and crevices of our country's unfortunately cracked foundation -- like weeds the grow in the cracks... like ants and vermin... like cockroaches that scatter when the lights come on...

Your being too nice!

Stop with the "sugar coating" already! : )

29 posted on 09/07/2003 1:31:04 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
Does ANYONE have a photo of this Peter Paul?

Honestly, I don't know.

I'll ask Mary, maybe SHE know's! : )

30 posted on 09/07/2003 1:33:50 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian
"The Bush Administration has no stomach for an investigation of Hillary Clinton"

I'm not so sure. If there is a possibility that the RATs will run her against the president in 2004 as the only candidate who could beat him, then he might just think seriously about neutralizing her. Personally, I would be gleeful to see her downfall. There would be an FR party/celebration of tremendous proportion, but, as I said before, I'm not getting my hopes too high. I think it more likely that this guy won't be breathing when he arrives back in the states....if he makes it that long.

31 posted on 09/07/2003 1:46:15 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
"Anyone have the link(s) of the list of dead "Friends of Bill"?

Here ya go:

Clinton Body Count

32 posted on 09/07/2003 1:49:05 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
"if Hillary comes out as a candidate for president, and THEN all at once the Bush Justice Department is going after her, can you imagine the field day the press will have with THAT?"

Especially since the democRATs wouldn't dream of doing such a thing! < /sarcasm >

33 posted on 09/07/2003 1:51:03 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I think you missed a few. One list I saw had nearly 60 names.
34 posted on 09/07/2003 1:52:18 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
Does ANYONE have a photo


35 posted on 09/07/2003 1:56:06 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
I ran across this letter dated July 16, 2001 from Peter Paul to Hillary Clinton. Interesting.

July 16, 2001

Senator Hillary Clinton

U.S.Senate
Washington, DC

Via Hand Delivery

Dear Hillary:

It is with profound regret and extreme disappointment that I am forced to write this letter to you reminding you of your responsibility as a Federal elected official to comply with the laws and regulations of the United States that you have sworn to defend and protect, and as a citizen, the same laws and regulations that govern your individual conduct.

As you are personally aware, in May, 2000, I was induced by your National Campaign Finance Director, David Rosen, your friend Jim Levin and your volunteer Hollywood talent coordinator and fundraiser, Aaron Tonken, to become the largest individual contributor to your Senatorial campaign in an effort to begin building a closer relationship with your husband in anticipation of his departure from public service to the private sector.

As you recall, I hosted a private fundraising luncheon for you at Spago, and a fund raising tea at Mrs. Gershman’s Beverly Hills Estate on June 9, 2000, and paid certain expenses in connection with that event in addition to making a commitment to contribute $150,000 in stock to your campaign. I subsequently committed to produce and underwrite the largest fundraiser of your campaign, which was also a Hollywood farewell tribute to the President, on August 12, 2000, at the Brentwood estate of our mutual friend Ken Roberts. Rather than make an additional contribution to your campaign, I was induced to underwrite all the expenses of the reception, concert and private dinner so that David Rosen could galvanize your faltering fundraising momentum and generate much needed “hard money” contributions net of any and all expenses. In good faith I fulfilled that commitment, even as the expenses skyrocketed from a projected $500,000 to well over $2 million!

No expense was spared to produce a poignant and historic evening when the luminaries of the entertainment industry shared their love and appreciation for the contributions made by the President and yourself during the previous eight years of the Clinton Administration. As you requested, I hired your friend Gary Smith to produce the concert part of the event, which he did superbly through his lend out company Black Ink Productions. Although Gary’s unconscionable fee of $850,000 for the concert was reduced at my request by $50,000 due to your personal intervention, you should know that Gary subsequently tacked on another $75,000 for his personal production fee which I was not made aware of until the day before the event. Further, Gary demonstrated the most egregious unprofessionalism in the way he sabotaged my script for Stan Lee’s introduction and the activities of his film crews that were charged with documenting the event. To add insult to injury, he fabricated additional expenses that Ken Roberts chastised him for, for which he held hostage the tapes of the event for three months. In addition, $20,000 is unaccounted for as a final withdrawal that is not documented from the segregated event bank account I am attaching a statement for.

I enjoyed your warmth and friendship during this period from June through August, 2000, when you and the President made my wife and I feel like family. Your warm letters and phone calls, your embraces and kisses when we met, the meals and events we shared together, and especially your and Chelsea’s heartfelt introduction of my wife to Barbara Streisand, led me to believe that we had succeeded in forging a real family friendship. Unfortunately these feelings were, at best, short lived.

Starting with your campaign spokesmen’s “Judas Strategy,” employed when they twice disavowed me, and my contributions to your campaign, to the Washington Post, thereby lying to the people and the media, I witnessed that side of your personality that I had always believed was an invention of your political enemies. I continued with the erroneous assumption that it was only political expediency for your Senate campaign and the national Presidential campaign, that required less than honest candor in acknowledging our relationship because of the sensitivities generated by my anti-Communist misjudgments a quarter century ago. I even believed David Rosen’s and Jim Levin’s reassurances that after the election we could resume our budding friendship.

Just a few days after the events in Los Angeles I was forced to ignore your campaign’s gutless and insulting decision to return the $2,000 check I gave you as part of the June 8, luncheon commitment, and the insensitivity of your statements that you would not accept ANY contribution whatsoever from me. This statement was made only days after you received the largest individual campaign contribution to a single candidate ever recorded in American history! So, a month later when David Rosen begged me to further contribute $55,000 to an abortion rights group that you had committed to based on my commitment relating to the Spago lunch, I ignored my better judgment and the more than $1.5 million I had already contributed on your behalf, so that your word would not be compromised.

Thereafter, from November, 2000, I was preoccupied with the business and market issues that all internet related companies were dealing with, as well as more insidious and nefarious issues relating to actions taken by company management and others intent on ruining me and the company I founded. When your promised support for the first global broadcast of the Hollywood Christmas Parade we produced did not materialize, and the invitations offered to dinners and gatherings were withdrawn, and after making the final contribution on your behalf at David Rosen’s direction in October, the only communication I received from you, the President, or your intermediaries, was an irate e-mail from Jim Levin in November protesting my failure to make a $250,000 payment to the Clinton Library as I had committed to do in August.

Thereafter, the “dot com” meltdown of the last quarter of 2000, resulted in my company, Stan Lee Media, along with more than 230 others, going into bankruptcy and the usual fingerpointing between management and others regarding whose fault it was. In my case, because of the Washington Post articles about my Cuban and cocaine convictions from the late 1970’s, I became a vulnerable scapegoat by all those wishing to avoid responsibility for their willful misconduct.

Thus, in late February, after I had made numerous calls for several months to David Rosen about how you were going to report my contributions to the FEC to ensure their legality, I was shocked to discover through internet access to your campaign filings, that all my contributions to you and your campaign were not reported, that the only report, relating to the Hollywood Gala, was false as to the identity of the donor and the amount donated, and that you had thereby made me a co-conspirator with you and others in violating various Federal statutes and regulations.

This was the fatal blow to any vestiges of friendship and respect that I may have retained towards you and the President, and it is this final betrayal that has precipitated my new adversarial posture towards you both, and your co-conspirators. I am now required by my conscience and sense of fair play to demand that you abide by the laws you swore to defend and uphold, which includes the requirement set out in Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations that you return all “illegal contributions within 30 days of determining the illegality.”

The accounting provided in the attached copy of my Federal Election Commission complaint shall also serve as my notice to you and your Senate Campaign Committee, of the amount of the direct, in-kind contribution I made to you and your Senate campaign, and no other, and of the statutory requirement you have to return such monies, which statute you have been in violation of since March 1, 2001, thirty days after the amended filing of your FEC report which through their false reports made my contributions illegal de jure.

Rather than perpetuating the signature Clinton ethic of denial, semantical and rhetorical responses to valid requests and questions, and stonewalling, it is time to accept your responsibility as a Federal elected official and do the right thing according to the letter of the law, the position your campaign spokespeople have taken, and natural laws of right and ethical conduct, and return the contributions I made, which you have by your collective actions, made illegal. Please direct your refund to my counsel at Judicial Watch.

Govern Yourself Accordingly,

Peter F. Paul

36 posted on 09/07/2003 2:05:02 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Bump and mark for later read
37 posted on 09/07/2003 2:10:29 PM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Paul's extradition to the U.S. is set for Sept. 12 - "if he lives that long," says the Post.

So, what's the matter? Aren't there any planes leaving Brazil until then, or don't we have a military plane transiting until then?

When (if) this guy gets into custody here, I hope they put him under deep protective custody! If not, his life-span will be short.

38 posted on 09/07/2003 2:17:36 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CT
Keep this man alive!

There is only one that do this, everybody that is saved pray!!!

39 posted on 09/07/2003 2:20:37 PM PDT by Bellflower (a Dem by any other name smells the same)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Re your Post #36, I found these two sentences particularly intriguing even in a letter of these hugely interesting facts...

I continued with the erroneous assumption that it was only political expediency for your Senate campaign and the national Presidential campaign, that required less than honest candor in acknowledging our relationship because of the sensitivities generated by my anti-Communist misjudgments a quarter century ago...

... you had thereby made me a co-conspirator with you and others in violating various Federal statutes and regulations....

Prediction; Mr. Paul will not live out the year if he indeed lives out the month!

40 posted on 09/07/2003 2:30:33 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson