Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mikegi
I think the problem is psychological. Throwaway boosters and capsules with ablative heat shields (which never failed) just seem so darn clunky and Model T.

Yet, for all the technological advancement, it STILL costs about 10 thousand dollars a pound to put something into low earth orbit on the Space Shuttle.

After 23 years of watching shuttles go up and (except for two occasions) come back safely, truly the only difference I see is that the shuttle cabin is more spacious and comfortable on a two-week mission.

And, well, maybe the food is better. Hope so: your lunch and the water to rehydrate it costs 10 grand.

13 posted on 09/07/2003 10:44:17 AM PDT by ihatemyalarmclock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ihatemyalarmclock
I think the problem is psychological. Throwaway boosters and capsules with ablative heat shields (which never failed) just seem so darn clunky and Model T.

That's the form over substance mentality. The objective is to get into space efficiently. A giant slingshot would be fine with me if it worked! The Shuttle is an amazing technological achievement but not the most efficient way of getting people into space (and back).

15 posted on 09/07/2003 10:56:33 AM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson