"American officials fear that many Europeans on the IAEA's 35-member board of governors, some of whose countries have lucrative trade ties with Teheran, will back Mr al-Baradei's position."
^%^& The Worthless scum sucking (Western) Euro-Pigs, let's blow this thing up, or let the Israelis do it, before the UN can come to the defense of the Islamonazis!
1 posted on
09/06/2003 6:09:25 PM PDT by
Pubbie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Pubbie
So what's GW going to do...send Powel up to the UN with a harsh letter?
2 posted on
09/06/2003 6:14:57 PM PDT by
dinok
To: Pubbie
WHAT IS "W" GOING TO TALK ABOUT SUNDAY NIGHT?
3 posted on
09/06/2003 6:15:01 PM PDT by
jaz.357
(Homeland security MUST shut down PETA for funding the domestic terrorist organization ELF!)
To: Pubbie
Unless the UN stops being a country club and does something about these people, I think we should withhold any payments to the UN altogether. Why pay for a dead horse?
Sanction them until they get off their butts. We've had enough welfare in this country already.
4 posted on
09/06/2003 6:16:42 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Pubbie
EuroPigs? Islamonazis?
To: Pubbie
This is the kind of problem that the Minuteman Missile was designed to solve.
To: Pubbie
Although Mr al-Baradei admits that the Iranians have deployed a variety of delaying tactics to prevent UN inspectors gaining access to secret nuclear facilities, he believes that they should be given more time to comply with their obligations under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. OY! Here we go again.
To: Pubbie
So Iran wants the Bomb?
Well, then, the U/S. should donate a few -- detonated over each of their nuclear facilities. It is time to stop pussyfooting around with the U.N. and Eurowimp opinion.
It's T.R. time. Enough speaking softly; it's time for the Big Stick!
P.S. that goes for North Korea, too. It's 'way past time to do what we should have done when they grabbed the Pueblo and its crew.
11 posted on
09/06/2003 6:23:46 PM PDT by
TXnMA
(No Longer!!! -- and glad to be back home in God's Gountry!!)
To: Pubbie
"Bush on Warpath" is an oxymoron.
To: Pubbie
The world can thank Russia for this.
To: Pubbie
Time for us to present the world with a Doomsday List. We announce a list of rogue nations that we believe may capable of producing nuclear weapons (Iraq, North Korea, Syria, Lybia, etc). Any of these nations could supply a nuclear bomb to terrorists who in turn could explode it in a US city, and we would have no way to know which one was responsible. Therefore it will be US policy to launch a full scale nuclear attack on every country on that list should such an attack occur. If any country on that list wants to be removed they can do so by meeting any and all conditions that we may require to be assured that they are no longer a threat. No negotiations or discussions. Just comply or pray nobody ever uses a nuke on America.
18 posted on
09/06/2003 6:29:30 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: Pubbie
Inspectors are particularly concerned about activity at a nuclear complex at Natanz, in central Iran, which has sophisticated equipment for enriching uranium to weapons grade standard. Even though the complex was built five years ago, the Iranian authorities only confirmed its existence to the IAEA earlier this year after its location was revealed by Iranian exiles
Here it comes......"What did Clinton know, and when did he know it?"
19 posted on
09/06/2003 6:30:02 PM PDT by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Pubbie
It "illegal" for Iran to have the nuclear weapons because Iran signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
I just wanted people to know this because it sounds as if Bush is having a hissy fit because Iran defied the USA or someting. It is not the case.
On the other hand India, signed no such treaty and is thus not violating any agreements (which is what internatioal treaties really are) to build nuclear weapons. If Bush tried to stop India from building nuclear arms for example The world could and would ask Bush--on what authority do you tell India this?
I think Pakistan is also a non-signer.
27 posted on
09/06/2003 6:34:27 PM PDT by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Pubbie
We currently have Iran surrounded pretty much.........nice of GW to ask for permission anyway.
Stay Safe !
31 posted on
09/06/2003 6:36:46 PM PDT by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: Pubbie
as fears mount that Teheran is on course to develop a nuclear weapons capability within two years. The major problem here is...the US has no credibilty left. We said Saddam was "on the verge" of producing nuclear weapons, missiles loaded and ready to fire containing chem's on the perimeter of Baghdad, etc. None of this was the case.
Unfortunately, Iran may be the "real deal" yet..."the boy who cried wolf" to many times will have a impact here.
Time for Israel is step up to the plate. We'll cover their ass(politically), should they need it...
40 posted on
09/06/2003 6:43:10 PM PDT by
Brian S
To: Pubbie
Although Mr al-Baradei admits that the Iranians have deployed a variety of delaying tactics to prevent UN inspectors gaining access to secret nuclear facilities, he believes that they should be given more time to comply with their obligations under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. Isn't he the same idiot that didn't catch the N. Korea's nukes???
44 posted on
09/06/2003 6:44:50 PM PDT by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Pubbie
Have we received an intelligence report from Tony Blair on this yet? Always good to have the Brits provide confirmation.
Richard W.
46 posted on
09/06/2003 6:47:53 PM PDT by
arete
(Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
To: Pubbie; Lord_Baltar; hchutch; Chancellor Palpatine; concerned about politics
58 posted on
09/06/2003 6:52:57 PM PDT by
nwrep
To: Pubbie
I have an idea.
We tell the Israelis that they can take the gloves off and clean out the paliterrorists. No more calls for 'restraint' from us.
In exchange they take their excellent pilots and all that great hardware we gave them and get rid of Iran's nuclear program. All of it.
It's win-win for the U.S.A and Israel, and lose-lose for the jihadies.
66 posted on
09/06/2003 6:59:03 PM PDT by
LibKill
(Will club baby seals for the heck of it.)
To: Pubbie
"Although Mr al-Baradei admits that the Iranians have deployed a variety of delaying tactics to prevent UN inspectors gaining access to secret nuclear facilities, he believes that they should be given more time to comply with their obligations under the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. " I say, give the Israeli's the thumbs up. We're probably the only reason they haven't already taken it out.
71 posted on
09/06/2003 7:00:44 PM PDT by
blam
To: Pubbie
level it, turn it to dust
80 posted on
09/06/2003 7:14:36 PM PDT by
The Wizard
(Saddamocrats are enemies of America, treasonous everytime they speak)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson