Skip to comments.
Sen. Clinton to Block Bush EPA Nominee
Associated Press ^
| 9-6-03
Posted on 09/06/2003 12:30:44 PM PDT by dogbyte12
NEW YORK (AP) -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Saturday she planned to block President Bush's nominee to head the Environmental Protection Agency over an internal report saying the EPA misled New Yorkers about health risks after the World Trade Center attack.
In a telephone interview, Clinton told The Associated Press she would place a hold on the nomination of Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, a procedural move that would prevent the full Senate from voting on his confirmation.
``This is an effort to get the administration that he wants to join to take responsibility,'' she said.
She said she held no personal grudge against Leavitt but hopes to use the hold on his nomination to force the administration to answer questions.
``This is a very big issue,'' she said. ``It not only has to do with the health and safety of the people I represent. It has to do with the credibility and trust of this entire government.''
A spokeswoman for Leavitt did not immediately return a call seeking comment. There was no immediate comment from the White House.
The report, issued by the EPA's inspector general Aug. 22, said the agency gave New Yorkers misleading assurances that there was no air-quality health risk after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack that spread debris, smoke and dust across lower Manhattan.
The EPA issued five press releases within 10 days of the attacks and four more by the end of 2001 reassuring the public about air quality. But it wasn't until June 2002 that the agency determined that air quality had returned to pre-Sept. 11 levels -- well after respiratory ailments and other problems began to surface in hundreds of workers cleaning dusty offices and apartments.
The White House ``convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones'' by having the National Security Council control EPA communications after the attack, said the report by EPA Inspector General Nikki L. Tinsley.
The administration has defended its decision, saying it was justified by national security concerns.
Bush nominated Leavitt, a Republican known as a moderate on environmental issues, to take over the EPA after administrator Christie Whitman announced she would leave the post.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 911epareport; epa; hillary; mikeleavitt; obstructionists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Labor Day has passed. Now it's going to get really nasty.
1
posted on
09/06/2003 12:30:44 PM PDT
by
dogbyte12
To: dogbyte12
The definiton of the word "petulance" in the Webster's Dictionary should be Hillary's face.
2
posted on
09/06/2003 12:33:03 PM PDT
by
Dane
To: dogbyte12
she's still thinking of running.
3
posted on
09/06/2003 12:34:59 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(Fight The Real Enemy...)
To: dogbyte12
I think Bush should act IMMEDIATELY and have Hillary over for dinner at the Whitehouse where he can grant her the opportunity to select the new head of the EPA. Hit her with maximum NEW TONE.
4
posted on
09/06/2003 12:37:27 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(This tagline has been suspended or banned.)
To: dogbyte12
The logical and inevitable end result of our GOP leadership's having rolled over so disgracefully,
re: Estrada.
In simple schoolyard terms: the swaggering bullies now know that they can take our milk money with impunity.
5
posted on
09/06/2003 12:41:06 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("The Clintons have damaged our country. They have done it together, in unison." -- Peggy Noonan)
To: ambrose
To me that would be a declaration of war. I would do more than sick Frist on it.
6
posted on
09/06/2003 12:41:20 PM PDT
by
AMNZ
To: dogbyte12
Well, blocking the judicial nominees has proved to be easy and with no adverse effect upon the Dems, so why shouldn't they go ahead and block any Bush nominee for any position?
7
posted on
09/06/2003 12:42:15 PM PDT
by
livius
To: dogbyte12
This is extortion. She's looking for Federal money to pay for the inevitable mile-long string of lawyers who will begin to sue.
8
posted on
09/06/2003 12:44:54 PM PDT
by
Glenn
(What were you thinking, Al?)
To: dogbyte12
This is getting REALLY sad. The most junior Senator in the joint can dictate policy to the Executive Branch, just as if She never left.
Shadow Government, and no mistake.
9
posted on
09/06/2003 12:48:42 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(Serving You... on Operation Noble Eagle!)
To: Glenn
Extortion.....and JUST how can the EPA work WELL without a LEADER to LEAD them...huh Hillary???
I think she has OVERREACHED this time.
To: dogbyte12
Actually--I wish we could block as many people as possible--not for Hilary's [urpose just so the we can have less people in federal govt dictating to us.
The more disfunctional the Federal Govt is the safer and freerer I feel.
11
posted on
09/06/2003 12:50:48 PM PDT
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Old Sarge
Ditt your #9.
12
posted on
09/06/2003 12:51:25 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Ann Archy
I know I will be raked over the coals on this one but I think this is a perfect opportunity to get rid of an ENTIRE department of our FED GOVERNMENT that is totally useless. NO head of the EPA.........OK........disban the entire department. Case closed.
13
posted on
09/06/2003 12:53:20 PM PDT
by
PISANO
To: PISANO
Never will happen...NEVER....so too on the Education Dept.....USELESS, but will never be disbanded.
To: farmfriend
ping
To: PISANO
NO head of the EPA.........OK........disban the entire department. Case closed.Oh Yeah, I like that strategy...
The enFIREonmentalists protection agency is a cancerous left wing organ in the first place. This could backfire on hitlery big time.
To: dogbyte12
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Saturday she planned to block President Bush's nominee to head the Environmental Protection Agency For some reason Frist and the GOP Senate fed the 'Beast Estrada meat; when it starts feeding, it can't stop.
17
posted on
09/06/2003 1:00:08 PM PDT
by
putupon
(Wake up and smell the RINOs.)
To: dogbyte12
How can she single-handedly stop this nomination?
Man the Senate has messed up rules!
18
posted on
09/06/2003 1:02:01 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: dogbyte12
``This is a very big issue,'' she said. ``It not only has to do with the health and safety of the people I represent. It has to do with the credibility and trust of this entire government.'' She has a lot of nerve. Her husband was once president - and she talks about credibility and trust?
Buy "Losing Bin Ladin" for everyone you know. Push that book. She's trying to distract from it.
19
posted on
09/06/2003 1:03:15 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Destro
The more disfunctional the Federal Govt is the safer and freerer I feel.Go to Somalia. No functional government. Is paradise?
20
posted on
09/06/2003 1:03:28 PM PDT
by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson