Professionalizing Teachers versus Improving the Profession

When the National Commission on Excellence in Education unleashed its blockbuster report, A Nation at Risk, in 1983, teaching was one of its foremost concerns. Slipshod preparation, shortages in key fields, and the inability to attract academically able people were just a few of the issues raised by the report. The commission made several recommendations to address these concerns, including higher teacher standards, performance-based pay, and alternative certification. Yet twenty years later, what started as an effort to improve the teaching profession has turned instead into professionalizing teacher improvement, with little to show in the way of improved school performance.

A Nation at Risk viewed teachers as crucial workers in an underperforming industry—U.S. schools. Almost before the ink was dry, however, Americans were presented with another view from a different report, A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century. This report said that teachers should shape school improvement, not merely be its instruments, and also shifted from the view that teachers should impart knowledge and skills to their students to the view that they should help children "learn how to learn."

A Nation Prepared was sponsored by the Carnegie Corporation, which had powerful allies with great staying power, political clout, and deep pockets. As a result, its teacher professionalization recommendations have gained more traction than the reform strategies policies urged in A Nation at Risk.

Among these professionalizing legacies is an alphabet soup of new groups such as the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) and the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) that dictate how teachers are trained, licensed, and deployed. Nearly every state now has a partnership with NCATE, giving it power to shape and approve certification programs. Half the states and many districts offer salary increases per the recommendations of the NBPTS. And sixteen states have created "professional" teacher standards boards that are insulated from the influence of elected officials and taxpayers.

For all the political and budgetary resources that have gone into professionalizing teaching, however, we have seen few results in the classroom. Pupil performance today is no better than it was twenty years ago. Professionalization has also crippled other worthy education reforms, especially those based on choice and standards.

Resistance to results-free professionalism may be growing. Alternative certification programs, charter schools, and programs such as Teach for America are proving to be popular, effective, and free of the union-dominated cartel arrangements from which the professionalizers draw strength. Skeptics are proliferating, too, now including U.S. education secretary Rod Paige, whose 2002 report on teacher quality explained that raising teacher standards is only part of the solution; states must also tear down the wall that keeps many talented individuals out of the profession.

Such talk alarms the professionalizers, who have grown accustomed to friends (and funds) in Washington. The funny thing is, Secretary Paige's advice is similar to that provided by the National Commission back in 1983. Maybe this time we will heed it and focus on boosting teachers' effectiveness instead of endlessly professionalizing them.

Sad fact is education has become another political football between the dems & Repubs. The Washington pendulum swings every 4-8 years and so does the changes in education. I don't think this bodes well for education over the long term.

More conservatives need to become teachers. Give up the personal career & bucks; become a school teacher. You want quality teachers.

All kinds of alternative teacher training out there. For all the talk about alternative teacher programs; I don't see many people taking advantage of what exists.

For all the political and budgetary resources that have gone into professionalizing teaching, however, we have seen few results in the classroom.

Professions, such as medicine and law, select their members from those who have survived the long road of undergrad training (cutthroat competition), graduate training (heinous competition), grueling internships (endurance competition), and finally professional exams. Most who start down the road wash out.

Imagine the quality of medical care you'd get if your doctor was 2.1 gpa undergrad, shied away from anatomy/phys, and whose only accomplishment was attending 3 inservices last year.

Or accounting advice if your accountant barely managed to pass "Math for Elementary Teachers", but attended a 3-hour inservice on tax preparation.

Or engineering work from someone who took high school physics and built a toothpick bridge once but saw a video presentation on how to build real bridges.

"Education" has a long way to go before it can be considered a profession with a capital "P".

More conservatives need to become teachers. Give up the personal career & bucks; become a school teacher. You want quality teachers.

Give up the bucks? The teachers in Springfield, Montgomery County (Phila suburb) have gone on strike for more bucks. The present starting salary for new teachers fresh out of college is $33,405. Nearly a third make more than $70,000 and a veteran teacher with a master's degree could pull down $80,000. That's for 190 days work with the summer off. Most of these are liberals.

I always heard teachers in alaska were highest paid anywhere too. But teachers continue to enter private sector at an ever increasing rate; must be a reason.

Wife is principal with 2 masters and 20 years, nowhere near that high. Teachers here start around 35 and work up to 60 after 20 years and several masters programs. Beginning teachers make mid 40's after 5 years and lots of summer classes.

You would think that if teaching was such a piece of cake combined with high pay; people from private sector would be coming in droves. Our district hires science majors and gets them certified due to the teacher shortage; just don't get enough applicants.

No easy answers. I think most people don't like breaking up fights, looking for pistols in backpacks, foul language, and just dealing with kids that haven't been brought up right by their parents these days; to be honest with you. Never believe what teachers go through until you become one you know.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.