Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiKapMom
Why would it be unwise to change the rules?

If the DEMs have applied the rules in a way that was never intended (i.e., invoking cloture rule for judicial nominations), then what would be so bad about closing the loophole?

Is it wrong for a minority of Senators to block a judicial appointment regarded as appropriate by the majority? If your answer is "it's permitted by the rules," then don't complain about the DEM use of the rule.

My opinion is that the rule is wrong and should be changed.

14 posted on 09/04/2003 2:31:35 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
I agree. The Constitution allows the Senate to advise and consent. It is wrong for a minority to be able to obstruct reguardless of who that minority is. We need judges and it is the responsibility of the Senate to confirm who is sent up unless there is a real non-political reason to not confirm. A majority fulfils that need.
18 posted on 09/04/2003 2:39:15 PM PDT by ImphClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson