Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The McClintock factor
WorldNetDaily ^ | Sept. 4, 2003 | Willian Rusher

Posted on 09/04/2003 1:58:51 PM PDT by FairOpinion

For many California conservatives, the most important thing about the coming recall election is how it will affect the future of a man who isn't likely to win it: State Sen. Tom McClintock.

For McClintock, from the standpoint of many conservatives, is by far the classiest figure in the array of 135 candidates who are running for the governorship in the Oct. 7 election. At 47, he has been active in California's Republican politics ever since he was elected to the Ventura County Republican Central Committee at the age of 19. In 1982, at 26, he was elected to the State Assembly. He lost a bid for Congress in 1992 and a contest for state controller in 1994. But he returned to the Assembly in 1996, moved up to the State Senate in 2000, and last November narrowly lost a second race for state controller, winning more votes than any other Republican on the statewide ticket.

Most important of all, McClintock is a rock-solid conservative on both social and economic issues. There is no question that he is the dream candidate of California conservatives for just about any office he might choose to run for. Right now, of course, that's the governorship.

McClintock is one of three Republican candidates still in the race (in an election process that continues to garner national attention), now that last year's losing nominee, Bill Simon, has dropped out. One of the others, of course, is Arnold Schwarzenegger. And the third is Peter Ueberroth, a self-classified "independent /Republican" businessman from Los Angeles.

Polls show Schwarzenegger leading this pack, with McClintock in the second spot and Ueberroth bringing up the rear. Schwarzenegger's two great strengths are his name recognition and his personal wealth. Ueberroth is also rich, but not nearly so widely known. McClintock is not a wealthy man, but his previous statewide candidacies, and especially his narrow defeat for controller last year, make him a relatively familiar name.

According to the polls, even Schwarzenegger would have trouble beating Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, who will be the sole Democratic candidate if (as expected) Gray Davis is recalled. But that is only because the three Republicans split the anti-Bustamante vote. Together, their votes swamp his. Small wonder, then, that Schwarzenegger's backers, and quite a few state Republican leaders, are suggesting that McClintock and Ueberroth ought to get out of the race and give Schwarzenegger an unobstructed shot at defeating Bustamante.

That is probably good advice as far as Ueberroth is concerned. His money can keep him in the race if he so chooses, but his poll numbers have never risen above the single digits and aren't likely to. But for McClintock, it's a much tougher decision. Polls show his support in the low double digits, with a tendency to rise. If he can engage Schwarzenegger in a few debates on the issues, he may very well impress viewers as far better informed and just about as good-looking. More important still, he may be able to establish himself as an attractive Republican candidate in the future for any statewide office – say, Barbara Boxer's Senate seat.

On the other hand, if Schwarzenegger loses to Bustamante by a margin smaller than the number of votes McClintock manages to attract (which is entirely possible), McClintock will be condemned as a spoiler who kept the Democrats in control of the governorship. And that's no way to build good will for future contests.

So it looks as if there should be some serious conversations between Schwarzenegger and McClintock. What can Schwarzenegger offer McClintock that would make it worthwhile for McClintock to get out of the race and endorse Schwarzenegger? Good conservative that McClintock is, it's a safe bet that any agreement will have a major policy component. But McClintock is also entitled to demand some consideration of his own future.

===

William Rusher is a Distinguished Fellow of the Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy. If you wish to write to Mr. Rusher, you can contact him c/o United Media; Editorial Dept., 4th Floor; New York, N.Y. 10016.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: arnold; bustamante; california; davis; election; governor; mcclintock; recall; schwarzenegger; ueberroth; willianrusher
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last
Obviously written by a strong McClintock supporter.

Even he can see the obvious:

"On the other hand, if Schwarzenegger loses to Bustamante by a margin smaller than the number of votes McClintock manages to attract (which is entirely possible), McClintock will be condemned as a spoiler who kept the Democrats in control of the governorship. And that's no way to build good will for future contests. "

But I don't agree at all with his "polite blackmail" idea that McClintock "is also entitled to demand some consideration of his own future".

The right thing for McClintock to do is to drop out, the way Issa and Simon did, FOR THE GOOD OF THE PARTY AND GOOD OF CALIFORNIA, which of couse would also be good for McClintock's future, if he does it the right way, and not try to "hold up" the Arnold camp and the Republicans. Most people don't respond too well to blackmail.

But if he would withdraw nobley, I am sure that he could play an important role in bringing back fiscal responsibility to the CA government, then he could run on a platform of his record, and accomplishments in the future.

1 posted on 09/04/2003 1:58:51 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Smary guy gets it, Arnold needs to make a deal w/ McClintock to get him to drop out and back him OR El Gubernador Bustamente takes over.
2 posted on 09/04/2003 2:02:40 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
This great cartoon by "Registered " makes the point succinctly of what could happen. Tom McClintock supporters should be the ones most concerned about this.

Frankly, I like Tom and his ideas and would like to see a better future for him, than this.


3 posted on 09/04/2003 2:03:12 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I read that Arnold's campaign have made overtures to McClintock, even to the extent that they would like to implement his ideas -- and of course McClintock could be a part of that and get credit for it.
4 posted on 09/04/2003 2:05:22 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Would that be enough for McClintock? He seems very determined, and his ego probably nearly matches Arnold's!
5 posted on 09/04/2003 2:09:22 PM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
his "polite blackmail" idea

I like the article, but I think it's unfair to characterize McClintock's not-dropping-out-unless-he-gets-dang-good-concessions as "blackmail." That's just good, clean hardball.
6 posted on 09/04/2003 2:12:11 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
In 1986, Tom McClintock stepped aside from a congressional race in which Bob Hope's son, Tony, ran. Tony Hope was seen as unbeatable. As it turns out, Tony imploded in the final weeks and lost to an obscure Simi Valley resident named Elton Gallegly, who has been in Congress ever since. I think this point of history is still on McClintock's mind.
7 posted on 09/04/2003 2:12:16 PM PDT by ambrose (Fight The Real Enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ
Would that be enough for McClintock? He seems very determined, and his ego probably nearly matches Arnold's!

McClintock has a hugh ego. Very soon when he sees that there is no way he can win and that he will only LOSE he will step aside under his "own terms" so he won't be a LEW-EW-EW-EWzer.

8 posted on 09/04/2003 2:13:27 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (See Jesse, see Jesse get arrested, see Jesse make bail and ride away in a limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I read that Arnold's campaign have made overtures to McClintock, even to the extent that they would like to implement his ideas -- and of course McClintock could be a part of that and get credit for it.

Yeah sure. Source?

9 posted on 09/04/2003 2:21:17 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I read that Arnold's campaign have made overtures to McClintock, even to the extent that they would like to implement his ideas -- and of course McClintock could be a part of that and get credit for it.

Source?

I think voters should vote their convictions.

If Arnold does not have enough support, it is his platform that is the problem, not McClintock supporters. Arnold needs to make a deal with McC if he needs McC's support. Or vice versa.

Maybe if Arnold changes his mind on the tax pledge and gun control, he might take away some McC supporters.

10 posted on 09/04/2003 2:22:50 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
OR El Gubernador Bustamente takes over.

In your opinion, will a Governor Schwarzenegger raise taxes in CA?

11 posted on 09/04/2003 2:23:00 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"hold up" my *ss! If he's going to sell his soul, they might, at least, offer him an attractive incentive to do so!
12 posted on 09/04/2003 2:24:03 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
IMO No he will not raise taxes. I am 100% sure Bustamente will riase taxes.
13 posted on 09/04/2003 2:26:03 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
It is diningenuous at best to proffer the idea that there is any benefit to McClintock if he withdraws because that assertion is unsupported by historical fact. The CAGOP has NEVER given McClintock real support and never will.

So just what threat does being in Gerry Parsky's dog house portend to him?

14 posted on 09/04/2003 2:27:24 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (California: Where government is pornography every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Peter Ueberroth is toast as far as I'm concerned, after last night's debate. He didn't even know what Prop 54 was all about! Arnold is terminating himself slowly but surely. Huffington is a fool. Camejo will take a few votes away from Boostyourtaxes. That leaves Tom McClintock standing tall, IMHO. Go, McClintock!!
15 posted on 09/04/2003 2:27:54 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Nice post, I agree.
16 posted on 09/04/2003 2:28:01 PM PDT by Tempest (If you lay off of Arnold, I'll lay off of Tom. Bustamante is the real danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
So just what threat does being in Gerry Parsky's dog house portend to him?

A very empty threat.

17 posted on 09/04/2003 2:30:04 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I agree. I've been a McClintock campaign contributor for his last four campaigns and have met him personally on several occasions. He is real, he is loyal to his principles, and he is in politics for all the right reasons. In short, he is an unusually good man. That being said, he has zero chance to win, but he has a big chance of electing Bustamante. I have urged him, and will continue to urge him, to drop out.
18 posted on 09/04/2003 2:30:39 PM PDT by 2iron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I appreciate your candor and standing up for your beliefs of how he will govern. Thank you.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/976103/posts?page=13#13
19 posted on 09/04/2003 2:38:08 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin.

20 posted on 09/04/2003 2:39:59 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson