Skip to comments.
Posner: Clinton’s Negligence Led to 9/11
NewsMax ^
| September 4, 2003
| Dave Eberhart
Posted on 09/04/2003 9:35:51 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: Bubba_Leroy
We need to get this one to the top of the best seller list.
2
posted on
09/04/2003 9:39:55 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
(Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: Bubba_Leroy
Time to vote the 'Toons off the planet.
3
posted on
09/04/2003 9:41:56 AM PDT
by
hang 'em
(Homos and RINOs and RATs, Oh My! Homos and RINOs and RATs, Oh My! Homos and RINOs and RATs, Oh My! H)
To: concerned about politics
It's already at #3 on the Amazon list.
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Bubba_Leroy
I'd say read it hear first but most Freepers know Clinton's negligence led to 9/11.
To get the word out: give the book for Christmas and birthday presents.
Write a letter to the editor of your local paper regarding the facts contained in this book.
Discuss it with friends.
6
posted on
09/04/2003 9:46:53 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: concerned about politics
BTTT
7
posted on
09/04/2003 9:47:05 AM PDT
by
Attillathehon
(Just got this story in my email.)
To: Bubba_Leroy
![](http://sonrisechurch.com/christ24.gif)
The Real Clinton Legacy
8
posted on
09/04/2003 9:49:23 AM PDT
by
Free ThinkerNY
(((Leftism is a form of mental illness)))
To: Bubba_Leroy
I saw Posner reveal the following regarding that (faked - supposed) Saudi Interrogation.
Saudi's are known to be savage against prisoners they are in earnest about. They torture and kill them in gruesome ways. This is known in the region. So the U.S. thought, we'll fake this guy out by putting him in with what he thinks are Saudis. He'll be terrified into opening up and giving all the information he has.
Instead the listening devices pick up this guy saying something to the effect, "Praise Allah, thank heaven they have turned me over to you guys." The implication was that he knew the Saudis were tollerant of terrorists.
From what I heard, I believe Posner nails down the Saudis better than just about anyone.
To: DoughtyOne; AnnaZ
The interview was fantastic & I plan on buying the book. His information was eye-opening.....we always knew the Saudis were not really our friends....but that sealed it.
Kinda freaky how all the princes died in mysterious ways.....
10
posted on
09/04/2003 10:13:38 AM PDT
by
Feiny
(Courtesy is not a sign of weakness.)
To: redlipstick
Wow! Number 3 already. When I saw him on O'Reilly I decided this book is a "must read" for me and apparently a lot of people feel the same way.
Terrific!
11
posted on
09/04/2003 10:14:40 AM PDT
by
Mears
To: DoughtyOne
And Posner's info could certainly provide another, more believable explanation for all those dead Saudi princelings a while back.
12
posted on
09/04/2003 10:15:17 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: concerned about politics
If this one is as good as "Case Closed" (about the JFK assassination), it will be a good read as well as informative and well-documented. When I cited this book in a thread about the Kennedy assassination, a conspiracy buff called me a "Posnerite," almost as if it were a religion.
To: feinswinesuksass
I agree. And I still think it was kinda freaky how people died around Clinton.
To: mewzilla
True.
To: Bubba_Leroy
So, what was Katie's response to all of this info....anyone?
16
posted on
09/04/2003 10:17:37 AM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
To: DoughtyOne
This sheds a new light on the whole impeachment fiasco.
The Senate had the grounds to eject that piece of excrement out of office. Unfortunately, it came down to "sex". When in reality, it was a heck of a lot more than that.
What was Starr doing? The best he could do was turn up Monica? 9-11 and the Cole are the results of a corrupt administration gone amuck.
17
posted on
09/04/2003 10:18:49 AM PDT
by
Credo
To: Bubba_Leroy
How the CIA tracked - and then lost - two of the hijackers when they entered the United States more than twenty months before the attacks.Isn't it the responsibility of the FBI, not CIA, to track and surveil suspects within the country?
18
posted on
09/04/2003 10:24:33 AM PDT
by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: Bubba_Leroy
ping!
19
posted on
09/04/2003 10:25:24 AM PDT
by
jmstein7
To: Credo
"What was Starr doing?"
Starr wasn't authorized to go on a fishing expedition. By law, he could only investigate matters that were officially given him to investigate.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson