Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCIENTOLOGY: NO RIGHTS, PLEASE
pagesix ^ | 09/04/03 | P6

Posted on 09/03/2003 10:24:53 PM PDT by Pikamax

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:16:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

TOM Cruise, John Travolta, Lisa Marie Presley, Kirstie Alley, Juliette Lewis and other Scientologists may have signed away many of the rights that most Americans take for granted. As they move up into the higher levels of the Church of Scientology, members sign documents giving up their right to psychiatric care and to see their families.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: scientology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-198 next last
To: Right Wing Professor
"Oh, but this is a good use of my time. I've seen you lads in operation. Every time a hitherto uninformed person checks out www.xenu.net, that's one more worthwhile thing I've done with my life, and one more who won't get fleeced by your merry band of sharks."

Think what you want. I'm a nice guy.
81 posted on 09/19/2003 1:23:43 PM PDT by callmemrpurpose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: callmemrpurpose
Read the authorized online version of Bare-Faced Messiah, The True Story Of L. Ron Hubbard.
82 posted on 09/19/2003 1:27:05 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: callmemrpurpose
I thought this site was edged towards "conservatism" but I have been disabused of that notion.

Exactly what part of conservatism involves being stupid?

83 posted on 09/19/2003 1:28:50 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: callmemrpurpose
Who knows. But if I had half a bain I might say it's because it's "COPYWRITED MATERIAL" like you said.

Perhaps if you had the other half of your brain you would want to know.

Since I couldn't say it better myself, I'll just repost what Heyworth said:

    "You miss the point. If it's false, a forgery, a slander upon Scientology, why does Scientology claim to have the copyright? By claiming copyright, they are claiming authorship."

You are saying the Xenu story is not true, yet Scientology admits it is true when the claim copywrite.

They did everything they could to keep that nutty story from seeing the light of day, but by suing those people, the documents they sought to protect were entered into the court files, and when those files were unsealed, EVERYBODY could know about Xenu. And the scam is unveiled.

84 posted on 09/19/2003 1:36:53 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Exactly what part of conservatism involves being stupid?

HEY! Let's leave Pat Buchanan out of this!

;-)

85 posted on 09/19/2003 1:37:47 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
You cannot sign away your rights.

That's what "unalienable" means.

86 posted on 09/19/2003 1:41:20 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
I couldn't believe it the first time I saw the actual "E-meter," which looks like a prop from a B-movie.

Um, that's because it IS essentially a prop from a B-movie. Just make sure you take the labels off the tin cans before you hook them up.

As I said earlier it is literally NOTHING but a wheatstone bridge circuit, used for measuring resistance. Of course, the meter doesn't really measure anything as it can be influenced by a myriad of factors, i.e. a "floating needle", which is supposed to signify the end of an auditing session, can be accomplished by just squeezing on the cans.

More information on these $4000 marvels of science can be found here:

Secrets of Scientology: The E-Meter

87 posted on 09/19/2003 1:56:46 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

To: Right Wing Professor
You never ran into these guys before?

Not personally. Certainly I've heard enough about them over the years as they've been much more litigiously aggressive than the Moonies or the Hari Krishnas and the like. But they don't seem to go after us old folks with established patterns of critical thinking and applied skepticism. As with most cults, they want the young, gullible, and the stupid (and rich doesn't hurt).

It was the clam part that I thought was hilarious. I may have heard it before, but like the spaceships, volcanoes, and Beano-Xenu, or like those castratos with the sneakers and the Snickers, it's the trivial but bizarre details that I tend to forget over the years.

89 posted on 09/19/2003 2:12:52 PM PDT by balrog666 (As long as people believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: js1138; AppyPappy; Right Wing Professor; balrog666; L.N. Smithee; mountaineer; StriperSniper; ...
Sorry, meant to ping you all to post 88.
90 posted on 09/19/2003 2:13:19 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: TomB; vikingchick
"A subsequent Electropsychometer audit by his personal physician revealed an alarmingly low tone"

He finally realized he was gay....LOL

91 posted on 09/19/2003 2:30:26 PM PDT by BossLady (Punch Card Voting Since 1981.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TomB
You've got a point. But that is just another way of turning attention away from that fact that the church is having illegal things done to it. So what if it is true. That doesn't change a thing, it's still illegal.

I don't nescessarily believe it but I haven't done OT 3 and respect that they hold it confidential.
92 posted on 09/19/2003 2:35:15 PM PDT by callmemrpurpose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
He finally realized he was gay....LOL

If an E-meter could tell you someone was gay, Nicole would have been divorced a heck of a lot sooner. :-)

93 posted on 09/19/2003 2:36:34 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
So? What is the problem?

Just remember, there is a chair for every ass in America.

94 posted on 09/19/2003 2:42:54 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Anyone who accepts the LA Times as the truth has no business calling anyone a RINO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callmemrpurpose; TomB
I don't nescessarily believe it but I haven't done OT 3 and respect that they hold it confidential.

I cannot help but contrast this blind faith that you have in the COS with the liberals always wanting to "protect" the little people, with a big government, that can handle things for them, and expose things to the sheeple, only when necessary. The government is supposed to "shelter the people", right?

Don't you see limited government as a conservative principle? But you are willing to allow broad-sweeping powers within the religion that you are affiliated with?

You are posting on a conservative forum, aren't you?

95 posted on 09/19/2003 2:43:48 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Send in Reno and the tanks. We have a dangerous cult here.
96 posted on 09/19/2003 2:46:44 PM PDT by Stew Padasso (Who is the tag whore now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith; callmemrpurpose
Har! Seriously, though, $cientology is irksome to anyone who is fond of things like critical thinking, freedom, or non-crappy science fiction.

It's sort of like Islam for the wealthy yuppie as far as its effect on people, though with Hubbard as the Prophet instead of Muhammed. They don't intend to kill all the infidels until AFTER they rule the world, though. :p

To be frank, the religion of $$$ is probably much more upsetting for an athiest than for any of us Christians. Imagine letting Carl Sagan loose on em!
97 posted on 09/19/2003 2:48:47 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Malacoda
If a chuch is defined as the Body of Christ, then why the heck do they call themselves a church if they deny the divinity of Christ? I never did get how they get away with that. I suppose they think it lends a patina of credibilty.

< /scratches head>
98 posted on 09/19/2003 2:51:13 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII
They aren't the only sect that uses the word "church" when it doesn't apply to them. I think it is supposed to lend an air of credibility.
99 posted on 09/19/2003 2:52:50 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I was in Scientology for a couple of years in the 70's. On staff even. Got out. What got me out was that the Hubster defined scientology as "The science of knowing how to know" - and yet, he just pulled this sh-t right out of his ass. There is NO science involved at all.

The stuff that pulls people in is the low level stuff, which is actually kind of useful, imho. But the upper levels are sci-fi. A useful usenet newsgroup is alt.religion.scientology.

Very expensive. Very flawed. Hubbard was an insane genius. My summation of scientology - a fool and his money are soon parted.

100 posted on 09/19/2003 2:53:23 PM PDT by searchandrecovery (It just doesn't matter. It just doesn't matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson