Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomB
You've got a point. But that is just another way of turning attention away from that fact that the church is having illegal things done to it. So what if it is true. That doesn't change a thing, it's still illegal.

I don't nescessarily believe it but I haven't done OT 3 and respect that they hold it confidential.
92 posted on 09/19/2003 2:35:15 PM PDT by callmemrpurpose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: callmemrpurpose; TomB
I don't nescessarily believe it but I haven't done OT 3 and respect that they hold it confidential.

I cannot help but contrast this blind faith that you have in the COS with the liberals always wanting to "protect" the little people, with a big government, that can handle things for them, and expose things to the sheeple, only when necessary. The government is supposed to "shelter the people", right?

Don't you see limited government as a conservative principle? But you are willing to allow broad-sweeping powers within the religion that you are affiliated with?

You are posting on a conservative forum, aren't you?

95 posted on 09/19/2003 2:43:48 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: callmemrpurpose
You've got a point. But that is just another way of turning attention away from that fact that the church is having illegal things done to it.

So, presenting a logical argument that the documents in question are accurate is just another way of distracting you? So you acknowledge that the documents are accurate, but you're not willing to consider the implications of what they say?

In other words, don't distract you with the facts, eh?

103 posted on 09/19/2003 2:57:50 PM PDT by Buggman (Jesus Saves--the rest of you take full damage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: callmemrpurpose
You've got a point. But that is just another way of turning attention away from that fact that the church is having illegal things done to it.

Actually, the entire discussion was the fairy tale that is the OT III and other upper levels of the CO$. I only brought up the copywrite issue to prove that the Xenu story is, in fact, what is taught in Scientology. You said it wasn't true, I proved it was. And whether or not the "papers" are copywrited, the law still makes provisions for fair use. Copywrite doesn't mean secret.

So what if it is true. That doesn't change a thing, it's still illegal.

It means your "religion" is a complete joke, written by a huckster. And no, talking about Scientology isn't illegal.

But seriously, now that you see that the bad science fiction story I outlined is acutally what is taught in the upper levels of your "religion", doesn't it make you think twice about what you are doing?

108 posted on 09/19/2003 3:23:11 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

To: callmemrpurpose
You've got a point. But that is just another way of turning attention away from that fact that the church is having illegal things done to it. So what if it is true. That doesn't change a thing, it's still illegal.

Actually, it does change a thing. It makes a lie out of what you said (that the documents were false). Obviously, we won't get anywhere with you (because you're a propaganda operative for the CoS, pretending to be someone else), but we can wipe the floor with you here and let everyone else reading this post see what a jackass you are and just how pathetic your cult is.

132 posted on 09/21/2003 2:02:56 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson