Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rethink sacred sites bill
The Daily Breeze | September 2, 2003 | Unknown

Posted on 09/02/2003 10:53:11 PM PDT by AnimalLover

Amid the chaos of the budget crisis and the recall election of Gov. Gray Davis, the Legislature is about to set up a powerful new regulatory agency in an effort to protect Indian sacred sites.

While the sacred places of American Indians should be protected, the imperious method chosen by lawmakers and the haste with which this new bureaucracy is being formed would scare Californians — if they knew about it. By rushing the sacred sites bill through in the last days of the legislative session, lawmakers are severely restricting public debate on the measure. The law of unintended consequences is sure to broadside the people of California shortly after the bill goes into effect.

Senate Bill 18 would empower the Native American Heritage Commission to regulate development on any land that includes or is close to an Indian sacred site. This would add a new, lengthy and costly regulatory process onto the already complex California Environmental Quality Act. There’s no distance limit between a project and a sacred site, so the Native American Heritage Commission could have power over projects that are quite removed from the sacred site itself.

What’s more, the bill includes very questionable secrecy provisions. It would make it a crime for anybody engaged in identifying a sacred site and gauging its importance to divulge any information about it to the public. The Native American Heritage Commission could conduct its proceedings on sites, including proposed mitigation measures required of developers, in secret. This would violate the public’s right to know about the process of government.

There’s so much about this new regulatory process that hasn’t even been considered by the governor and lawmakers. For example, who is going to pay for it?

Complying with new sacred sites regulations on top of environmental regulations would add costs for both property owners and public agencies planning development and construction. Not only would building a new house possibly become more expensive, but so would building a new school or road. When revising a general plan for a region or specific plan for a development, cities and counties would have to consult with the commission first. Who will pay those public costs?

And just how far will the new commission expand its reach? Will it insinuate itself far afield from proposed developments, if it could argue that the developments would affect sacred sites?

Instead of this heavy-handed approach, funding could be established, using tribal and public resources, to protect sacred sites identified by the Native American Heritage Commission. These sites could be set aside as preserves. The answer to protecting sacred sites need not be a powerful new state regulatory commission whose costs will be borne by property owners and local governments.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: californiabill; sacredsites
Here we go again!

I don't know what they are sniffing in Sacramento but they keep putting out these ridiculous bills.

What can we do?

1 posted on 09/02/2003 10:53:11 PM PDT by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
I live in Los Angeles and I know what I'm doing if Cruz Bustamante gets into office:

M-O-V-I-N-G to sunny Lake Tahoe, NV
2 posted on 09/02/2003 10:59:43 PM PDT by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; sasquatch
Senate Bill 18 would empower the Native American Heritage Commission to regulate development on any land that includes or is close to an Indian sacred site. This would add a new, lengthy and costly regulatory process onto the already complex California Environmental Quality Act. There’s no distance limit between a project and a sacred site, so the Native American Heritage Commission could have power over projects that are quite removed from the sacred site itself.

This is a disaster in the making. Tribal government is the only true socialism we have in this country. Putting socialists in charge of developement and infrastructure will accelerate the balkanization of California.

3 posted on 09/02/2003 11:09:57 PM PDT by forester (Reduce paperwork -- put foresters back in the forest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forester
Actually most of these so called leaders are pure fascists.


They are several steps beyound socialism.
4 posted on 09/02/2003 11:22:32 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
We are getting hit from everywhere. Has anyone read
this?

American Indian Movement Honors Castro

http://www.judicialwatch.org/090203_PR.shtml
5 posted on 09/03/2003 12:23:20 AM PDT by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AnimalLover
I can see it now- No building in that canyon round-eye, that was the site of the Great Medicine Roulette Wheel, not there either, Great Chief Keno's number came up there,and certianly not there, for that is the very spot where Pokerhandas was dealt a raw deal by the one armed bandit, Black Jack Menthol Lights.
6 posted on 09/03/2003 2:40:32 AM PDT by zygoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forester; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave; sasquatch
Personal property is already sacred.
7 posted on 09/03/2003 3:36:57 AM PDT by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: risk; AnimalLover; Carry_Okie; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; sasquatch
The following quote is from a letter submitted to Senator Burton by the California Licensed Foresters Association (CLFA):

The legislation also stipulates that the Native American Heritage Commission must determine whether a Traditional Tribal Cultural Site (TTCS) is within 5 miles of a proposed project's boundaries during its lengthy review of a project listing proposal. There are currently 150,000 known prehistoric archeological sites in California. If only 1% of the known sites in our state were upgraded to TTCS status, this would mean that an area equivalent to ¾ of the entire state (75 million acres) would be covered by these TTCS circles.

The potential for the above "supersized" temporal and spatial definitions to lead to government abuse is obvious, and alarming.

CLFA also has concerns about language in the bill which suggests that reviewing public agencies can bring tribal representatives onto private property during project review -- even if expressly against the wishes of the landowner. We believe that the written permission of the landowner should always be required in advance of such an arrangement.

8 posted on 09/03/2003 6:46:19 AM PDT by forester (Reduce paperwork -- put foresters back in the forest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: forester
If it weren't so damaging to the innocent, a few years of this crap might be instructive. People would get so fed up with tribal corruption that they might rescind Indian gaming.
9 posted on 09/03/2003 9:54:45 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; forester
This is a disaster in the making. Tribal government is the only true socialism we have in this country.
Actually most of these so called leaders are pure fascists.

You're both wrong. They're democartically elected leaders of their respective sub-nations who operate under constitutional governments. Beyond, the Hertitage Commission is mostly made up of members of non-federally recognized tribes because the casino tribes are too busy making money and employing people to sit around on a board that until recently did nothing.

That being said, this is a stupid law being pushed through the State Senate and Assembly by a couple radical enviromental wackos who are nominally part of non-recognized tribal governments. And the main thrust is to prevent development in Southern California, mostly because the enviromentalists haven't been winning as many legal battles using 'endangered species' as their excuse.

Every tribal leader I know opposes this bill and I hope that, like last time, Davis answers his phone when they call to demand that he veto it like last time. Alas, it likely won't work out that way because Davis is counting on the enviromentalist vote.

Just remember, Democrat radicals are continuing to use the tribes as their puppets, doing what's right for them even over their objections.
10 posted on 09/03/2003 11:49:55 AM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson