Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives shouldn't shy away from core values
The Fresno Bee | August 27, 2003 | Jim Patterson

Posted on 09/02/2003 10:16:02 PM PDT by sruleoflaw

I believe it is OK to post Fresno Bee articles. If there is a problem, could a McClintock supporter, please clean this up for me. I won't ask anything from a Schwarzenegger backer.

This is dedicated to the McClintock supporters, who believe that unborn children have value, that marriage is between a man and a woman, that limited government is the best government, that people should assume responsibility for actions, that business should be encouraged, that illegal immigration should be actively opposed (rather than conveniently ignored) and taxes should not be raised (and McClintock signed the no tax hike pledge).

Conservatives shouldn't shy away from core values

By Jim Patterson (Published Wednesday, August 27, 2003, 8:58 AM)

California conservatives are being advised to muzzle our core beliefs in order to elect a Republican to statewide office again. Campaign operatives say our ideas don't sell any more, and we must throw them over in order for a Republican to win again in the Golden State. Pundits say we are in the political wilderness and that the only way out is to compromise our ideals. History teaches a very different lesson. Abraham Lincoln, the founding father of our party, was fond of a pesky, obscure little document called the Declaration of Independence, especially the phrase about Americans being endowed by their Creator with rights that government could not take away - rights like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Today, many in our party would insist ol' Abe hush up about God, the right to life and the political pre-eminence of the individual. Mr. Lincoln lost more elections than he won and spent a considerable time in his own political wilderness until the times demanded his ideas and values. Those ideas and values freed a people, saved the union and changed history.

In the 1930s, another conservative spent some time in the wilderness. Winston Churchill was ridiculed, vilified and politically sidelined because he was so hard on Hitler and the Nazis. The times, he was told, required tolerance and compromise. His own party advised him, in the modern vernacular, to chill out and lighten up. But Churchchill was a true believer in life and liberty and in the responsibility of government to secure those rights for everyone, forever. Sound familiar? Mr. Churchill's conservative ideology, and his willingness to hold it firmly, saved Britain and the European continent from a return to the Dark Ages.

In our own times, we have the example of Ronald Reagan. In the warm afterglow of today it is easy to forget that even Mr. Reagan spent time in the political wilderness and was vilified for his conservative principles. He lost to Gerald Ford in the presidential primary of 1976, in part, because many in our party feared he could not be elected.

Instead, America got Jimmy Carter, a national malaise, and a misery index that drove inflation, unemployment and interest rates to all-time highs. In four short years, Americans were finished with Mr. Carter and his malaise and turned overwhelmingly to Mr. Reagan's conservative optimism of limited government, lower taxes, life, liberty and all the blessings those values bring us, and America came back stronger than ever.

On the international stage, Mr. Reagan and his ideas stole the show and he became the star attraction. He broke with a long line of national and international left-wing appeasers of communism who were satisfied with merely containment or détente. He had the conservative audacity to believe American-style freedom, strength and positivism could actually defeat communism and roll it back. Apparently Mr. Gorbechev got the message and tore down that wall. Like Lincoln and Churchill before him, Mr. Reagan's buoyant conservatism brought freedom and prosperity to millions, you and me included.

Sadly, too many California Republicans -- and the left-leaning pundits they listen to -- have forgotten these powerful lessons of the past and have governed not much differently than liberals. Think about this: It was Republicans in the California Legislature who passed the now infamous state budget of 2003. It was -- I am embarrassed to admit -- Republicans who gave the OK to a budget that tripled the car tax, borrowed $10 billion to pay for historic runaway spending and still left California $8 billion in the red.

This is what happens when Republicans are more concerned with holding office than with leading by example and principle. We might be successful at winning an election, but we might lose the opportunity to change things for the better.

Ideas matter. They are the powerful engines of freedom and opportunity. Conservative ideas have stood the test of time and circumstances. They formed the foundation for the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Millions in America and across the globe are now more free and prosperous because leaders who held conservative ideas were not afraid to say so or to use them to govern. Holding office is meaningless if the pathway to that office sheds the very ideas we need to secure the blessings of liberty.

California Republicans shouldn't shun our conservative foundations. We should champion those ideals as the solution to California's problems.


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: conservative; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/02/2003 10:16:03 PM PDT by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
BUMP -- dedicated to the great McClintock supporters on this website. Unlike the others, you remain true to the principles of Ronald Maximus.
2 posted on 09/02/2003 10:20:00 PM PDT by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
As Michael Medved told one of our FReepers on his call-in radio show today, voting for McClintock only amounts to "feeeeeel goooood masturbatory voting."
3 posted on 09/02/2003 10:25:23 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
Conservatives shouldn't shy away from core values

I have no intention of doing, anything of the kind.

4 posted on 09/02/2003 10:27:14 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw; Chancellor Palpatine; Cultural Jihad
I believe it is OK to post Fresno Bee articles. If there is a problem, could a McClintock supporter, please clean this up for me. I won't ask anything from a Schwarzenegger backer.

Including, apparently, their vote.

5 posted on 09/02/2003 10:27:30 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Micheal Medved has gotten down right pathetic.

He also came out against Judge Moore and the 10 Commandments.

6 posted on 09/02/2003 10:28:49 PM PDT by Princeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
Unlike the others...

That's what I really like about McClintock, and especially his supporters. They're amazing consensus builders. ;)

7 posted on 09/02/2003 10:30:19 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Is Michael Medved supposed to be some kind of conservative? Right. Just like Dick Morris is conservative. Sure.
8 posted on 09/02/2003 10:30:36 PM PDT by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
Another elect Bustamante thread? Hope not!
9 posted on 09/02/2003 10:32:04 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Medved supports open borders. 'Nuff said.
10 posted on 09/02/2003 10:32:04 PM PDT by ambrose (If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
He called it right as far as voting for McClintock goes, though, since doing so throws your vote to Cruz Bustamante, who is an extremist on abortion and homosexuality. But his point was that these voters don't really care. They just want to feeeeeel gooooood about themselves. He called it a form of selfishness.
11 posted on 09/02/2003 10:32:25 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Including, apparently, their vote.

The rest of us don't have the luxory of a state sponsored firewall and flexible hours.

Perhaps it is you that is out of touch. Or did you get a job that doesn't seek funding from the people?

12 posted on 09/02/2003 10:33:15 PM PDT by nunya bidness (sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
What I find truly fascinating is how few people actually comment on the content of the articles posted.

You Ahnold Kool-Aid drinkers come across as those Rats who read off Talking Points in response to any argument presented.
13 posted on 09/02/2003 10:33:53 PM PDT by ambrose (If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Not at all, there just is no interest in throwing away my vote in such a way that would elect a Democrat!
14 posted on 09/02/2003 10:35:50 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
Perhaps it is you that is out of touch. Or did you get a job that doesn't seek funding from the people?

Yes, I did. IIRC, you've asked this before, and you've been told this before. But, of course, acknowledging that you were told this this would deny you your opportunity to smear your opposition.

You're doing a fine job of convincing me to vote for McClintock.

15 posted on 09/02/2003 10:37:52 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
Jim Patterson is the former mayor of Fresno who, IIRC, tried to run for Congress and lost in the primary. A conservative who couldn't even win in the Central Valley!
16 posted on 09/02/2003 10:52:01 PM PDT by Penner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

here's to MechaClintock turning your home and family over to the Aztlan hordes for the sake of his perverse ego and at the behest of religious wackjobs

enjoy!

17 posted on 09/02/2003 11:15:54 PM PDT by dwills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Princeliberty
you should take liberty out of your name

i don't listen to medved, but he got that one right too
18 posted on 09/02/2003 11:17:21 PM PDT by dwills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
Conservatives shouldn't shy away from core values

Conservatives don't, Neo-Cons do. Sad.
19 posted on 09/02/2003 11:17:46 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
reagan wouldn't recognize you 'my way or the highway' RINOS

he reserved that attitude for communists and not members of his former dem party . . . let alone fellow republicans
20 posted on 09/02/2003 11:19:01 PM PDT by dwills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson