(Looked, but didn't see it posted yet.)
 |
| Sat Aug 30,10:29 PM ET |
|
Japan, China and South Korea (news - web sites) plan to develop an operating system to challenge the domination of Microsoft Corps' Windows(AFP/File) |
Posted on 09/02/2003 8:45:07 PM PDT by Happy2BMe
(Looked, but didn't see it posted yet.)
|
| Sat Aug 30,10:29 PM ET |
|
Japan, China and South Korea (news - web sites) plan to develop an operating system to challenge the domination of Microsoft Corps' Windows(AFP/File) |
It was only a matter of time before this challenge happened...
Oh yeah, that's sure to work out well.
How many places can we hide startup programs already?! How many places can we hide different configuration information for different users?!
Asians know how to read, write, and program in English.
Westerners haven't got a clue what they are (or would be) looking at once the new Asian OS takes off.
Hmmm... would M$ get more or fewer hacker/trojan/virus attacks with a Billion and a half fewer users?
Yeah, that PLUS addictive winders!
Asians love "point-and-click" and will never go back to command line (and you know it). . hehe...
Don't forget, the most powerful skill in Asia is duplication of products that appeal to the masses.
Wonder, will their OS have English text support built in?
Nope - Miker$of is already in position to give the source code away in Asia.
Not just that, but M$ just made a hugh deal with Tiawan to sell a WinXP Home and OfficXP bundle for $49 a pop!
What do the Asians know that we don't?
MicroSoft has its own amatuerish architectural design to blame for this sort of new, global, subsidized competition sprouting up.That said, however, Asia will probably screw the pooch and get it all wrong. A new OS that doesn't run most existing business software will probably die on the vine.
Businesses already have large amounts of existing code. A new OS would need to flawlessly run most of that existing code to pose a viable threat to MicroSoft.
For instance, if a company convinced IBM to license its final/last set of OS/2 components (essentially Windows 95), a new OS could be quickly and inexpensively written that would run some 80% of existing MicroSoft compatble software.
Now throw in IBM's or a Baby Bell's UNIX/Linux rights into that same OS and you've got even more global compatibility.
Heck, if you are going that route, might as well license AS/400 and include it into the mix.
Anyway, after China got a look at the MS Windows source code, building a new competing OS shouldn't really surprise anyone...
Babel will replace Google in the AsiaOS.
Just how excluded will Westerners be from using it?
The more exclusive the OS is to Westerners, the more popular it may become with Asians?
The next generation OS should essentially be a Browser, anyway.What we do...we do online. 'Tis the global way of the future based upon trailblazing American experience here first.
Yes, you should have Babelfish and Google input boxes on your task bar. The OS should seemlessly tie in POP3 access to whatever new software you care to develop on it, too.
The OS should scroll breaking news and stock prices just above the task bar.
The OS should allow you to divide and share your programs and CPU cycles with other business partners/friends who are likewise online.
And ideally, the OS should be tiny...just large enough to get online and download a full OS session much like running the MSDOS command prompt lets you do under Windows today...such that you could pick AS/400, MVS, Unix, Linux, Windows, whatever you needed (each in separate processes/windows).
Yeah, the "Fifth Generation" computer project. Government investment is a piss-poor substitute for private capital markets - they might as well have taken that money and flushed it directly down the toilet for all it got them. Now throw in the additional forces of nationalism among the developer countries in this project, take the usual fate of software designed by committee into account, recognize the fact that there's a good chance that someone will decide that reworking Linux isn't good enough so they'd really prefer to do it all from the ground up...
The main thing is how ambitious they get - MITI had absurdly unrealistic goals for the Fifth Generation project, and wound up with doorstops instead. If they stick to a plan of a relatively minor reworking of Linux, they're likely to come up with something decent. I'll bet that they won't, and they'll decide to reinvent the wheel in some fit of pan-Asian pride. In which case, it'll either never see the light of day, or it'll blow chunks, making everyone wish it never saw the light of day.
Why would they want to steal from something as non secure as Windows? I'm guessing it will be 1000 times more secure as they look at the code for windows and laugh their asses off. I mean, how many buffer overflows does it take for M$ to fix a fundamental problem. I bet the Asian version will see a lot fewer buffer overflows.
No more Jolt cola for you! You're describing "Shimmer", the better operating system through chemistry. First you say the OS should be a browser (I assume you mean the OS's UI). Then you say this OS should allow you to delve out cycles to others, which would require a large multiuser networking component. Finally, you decide that the OS should just be something like a tiny "boot from netcard" BIOS - a BIOS that supports multiple processes and includes a windowing system. Where does this multiprocess code (API, disk DDI, disk API, process APIs, etc.) come from? Where does the windowing system (graphics API, DDI, and drivers, etc.) come from? You'll need an OS just to do those tasks, before you start piling on the other operating systems!
Have you seen the Windows source code? Have you written an operating system?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.