Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger says campaign period is too short for debates
Associated Press ^ | 09-02-03

Posted on 09/02/2003 4:36:40 PM PDT by Brian S

San Francisco-AP -- Celebrity and gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger is suggesting that he's too busy campaigning, and that he doesn't have the time to engage in too many candidate debates.

Schwarzenegger, appearing on a California radio talk show program (on K-R-L-A), was explaining his decision to only take part in one debate on September 17th. He says he's gotten so many offers for debates he can't do them all -- with just a little more than a month left in the campaign to unseat Governor Gray Davis.

Schwarzenegger also rejected criticism that he doesn't have any real Republican credentials. He says he registered for the Republican party just a month after emigrating from Austria, 35 years ago.

Schwarzenegger says he heard President Nixon speak about free enterprise -- and that inspired him to rush out to register with the Republican party.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Carry_Okie
This thread reads like the minutes of a moron convention.
21 posted on 09/02/2003 7:08:12 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Vote McNader and Bustamonte wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
Read them back to us, Mr. Secretary.
22 posted on 09/02/2003 7:12:29 PM PDT by lambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
The morons are people from Floriduh who think their opinions on California politics are worth heeding.
23 posted on 09/02/2003 7:15:37 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (California! See how low WE can go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
This thread reads like the minutes of a moron convention.

Good Heavens, another passerby stating the obvious! 'Course it is! What did you think this was, a Mensa Society thread?

24 posted on 09/02/2003 7:20:53 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Go ahead, make my day and re-state the obvious! Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I think Arnold is the only viable candidate who would not face an immediate recall effort by the opposition party. JMO.

Guess he might face one from his own party. Wouldn't that be funny? Well, probably not if you happen to live in CA.
25 posted on 09/02/2003 7:27:06 PM PDT by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
The campaign is too short, only because you don't have a platform to run on Arnold.

Do the honorable thing, drop out now, and place your support behind TOM McCLINTOCK's efforts to save Kalifornia from BustaMEChA. The time has come to admit your campaign is without substance, and you are interloper in the world of politics. Your only ambition is to muck-up the Kalifornia political scene.

Leave tomorrow and throw your support behind the only candidate who stands a chance of reversing the tide of socialism in Kalifornia.... TOM McCLINTOCK.
26 posted on 09/02/2003 7:32:07 PM PDT by Duramaximus (Freedom Loving American Living In A State That Worships Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Pro-Arnold Bump :-)
27 posted on 09/02/2003 9:05:40 PM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
Why President Bush won't publicly endorse Tom is mystifying. He is the only one capable of restoring California's economic health.

Aside from the fact that he can't work with the legislature and has no bully pulpit, of course.

That in turn would help the national economy, making reelection much easier.

Yeah, Tom McClintock's 100% vetoing of any and all legislation that isn't to his standards of perfection will REALLY get the state moving in 2004.

28 posted on 09/02/2003 9:08:37 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jfritsch
Absolutely WONDERFUL. Great post. Arnold is a coward in the political arena, afraid to debate McClintock.
29 posted on 09/02/2003 9:08:48 PM PDT by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
ROME2000 -- APOLOGIZE NOW. You were one of the big anti-McClintock posters on Saturday.

Ray Haynes HAS NOT ENDORSED ARNOLD. I called Ray's office today and THEY SAID RAY HAS NOT ENDORSED ARNOLD.

Do you feel bad about spreading false information for Arnold, who is barely a Republican?

Remember what Ben Stein when asked by Chris Matthews why wasn't voting for Arnold: "Well, because I'm a Republican." Rome2000, I wish you were with the real Republicans.
30 posted on 09/02/2003 9:12:34 PM PDT by sruleoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw; Chancellor Palpatine; hchutch
Ray Haynes HAS NOT ENDORSED ARNOLD. I called Ray's office today and THEY SAID RAY HAS NOT ENDORSED ARNOLD.

And CLINTON SAID THAT HE DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN, MONICA LEWINSKY.

I'm sure that you accept Clinton's tortured parsing of "sexual relations" as being grounded in fact.

31 posted on 09/02/2003 9:16:02 PM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: templar
Felons I can tolerate . { I've known a number of decent and rightous felons ) , but once a man has deliberately lied to me I never beleive anything he tells me again .

Your words templar .

32 posted on 09/02/2003 9:41:11 PM PDT by Ben Bolt ( " The Spenders " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Post #2 was full of articulate, intelligent reasons for not voting for Mr. Schwarznegger. Well done!
33 posted on 09/02/2003 9:46:36 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
In all fairness, he has already scheduled a ton of campaign visits to a lot of cities. He is even visiting our small community in the near future (We have approx. 90,000 in this county alone).

Perhaps that seems insignificant. But think about it. When the town papers show his visits, when his picture is glaring on the FRONT page, when he visits those towns with populations of a couple 100 thousand, and he visits "several" of them a day for "7 days a week" that is pretty good campaigning. That matters.

Especially if the televised debates run "during the day" when people are at work! After all, the newpapers are read by people who read them when they have a chance. Before or after work when their attention is undivided.

YOU figure it out. Sounds to me like a pretty good political move! The people whose town he visits, are gonna love it. He is putting THEM first!! Not the media!! The perfect snub.
34 posted on 09/02/2003 10:04:51 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
He should debate. Period.
35 posted on 09/02/2003 10:11:45 PM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
He is.. period.
37 posted on 09/02/2003 10:24:42 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Vets_Husband_and_Wife
Good. Period.
38 posted on 09/02/2003 10:31:12 PM PDT by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sruleoflaw
I'm a "real" Republican, and I'm for Schwarnegger. I wish some of YOU would quit with the HOLIER than thou attitude and quit name calling those of us who prefer Schwarznegger over McClintock.

We happen to think/know McClintock cannot win California.

I think I will start a PING list so I can shout "I TOLD YA SO" when "ONCE again" we LOSE California if people don't wake up and smell the coffee.
39 posted on 09/02/2003 10:31:35 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Conservababe
:o)
40 posted on 09/02/2003 10:31:59 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife (CNN: where " WE report what WE decide!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson