Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal appeals court in San Francisco overturns an estimated 100 death sentences.
CNN ^

Posted on 09/02/2003 12:35:19 PM PDT by jern

Federal appeals court in San Francisco overturns an estimated 100 death sentences. Watch CNN or log on to http://CNN.com (AOL Keyword: CNN) for the latest news.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; US: Arizona; US: California
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; deathpenalty; judicialactivism; judiciary; liberals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: jern
I haven't slogged through all 90 pages of Summerlin v. Stewart, but the link to the case at the 9th circuit is below:

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/C9D33A3EF8BC665C88256D95005BFD72/$file/9899002.pdf?openelement
41 posted on 09/02/2003 2:54:46 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
"I'm dumb"

From the mouth of babes.
42 posted on 09/02/2003 3:02:15 PM PDT by TheDon (Tick, tock, tick, tock...the sound of the clock ticking down the time until Tom drops out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
And you I see are as rude, crude and clueless as your screen name.
43 posted on 09/02/2003 3:03:01 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Nice tag line.
44 posted on 09/02/2003 3:12:14 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (“I don’t recall… I have no memory of that…I simply don’t know” – Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
Thank you!
45 posted on 09/02/2003 3:38:22 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CWW
I guess it's impossible to reconstitute the jury and resentence these scum dogs.
46 posted on 09/02/2003 3:48:56 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig ("Here's your one chance, Fancy don't let me down.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Peach
And you engage in a great deal of projection. ;^)
47 posted on 09/02/2003 4:01:52 PM PDT by TheDon (Tick, tock, tick, tock...the sound of the clock ticking down the time until Tom drops out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jern
"In Ring v. Arizona, the Supreme Court ruled that a jury, rather than a judge, must make a finding of "aggravating factors" where those factors underlie a judge's choice to impose the death penalty rather than a lesser punishment."
48 posted on 09/02/2003 5:51:17 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
the prisoner will never get paroled...

Yeah...and he'll NEVER escape.
That NEVER happens.

49 posted on 09/02/2003 6:05:21 PM PDT by evad (liberals & lying..It's WHAT they do, it's ALL they do and they WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: dogbyte12
the Supreme Court ruled in 2002, that juries must be the ones giving death out. Then didn't say if they meant this retroactively or not. By not stating, the supreme court created this issue.

The Supreme Court case, Ring v. Arizona (2002), was based on Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), and Apprendi turned out to be not retroactive, according to U.S. v. Cotton (2002).

If Apprendi isn't retroactive, then it seems to me that Ring probably won't be retroactive either. But then again, "death is different", so it's hard to say.

Haven't read today's 9th Circuit decision yet. I did scan it though and noticed that Cotton wasn't even mentioned. Regardless, it should be an interesting read.

51 posted on 09/02/2003 7:06:41 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
The U.S. Supreme Court...found that juries, not judges, must render death sentences.

Anyone know where in the Constitution they found this requirement?

Sixth Amendment. The article doesn't make clear what happened. The jury had found Ring guilty of first-degree felony murder, which by Arizona law had a maximum sentence of life in prison. At sentencing, the judge determined that there were aggravating factors and gave Ring the death penalty. Note that the sentence was based on facts that were never determined by the jury, which is a violation of the 6th Amendment's jury trial guarantee. It's a good decision.

52 posted on 09/02/2003 7:21:17 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
It's a pity that the extra piece that the judge made his decision on was not presented before a jury. As the victim's only living relative I had a copy of the statement and did not know until Ring v. Az that the jury did not see it. It is a damning testimony from one of his co-conspirators. The most disgusting part of the statement was when Tim Ring shot his victim, turned to his co-conspirators and said, "Aren't you going to congratulate me on my shot?"
I am working on this whole forgiveness angle, with seeing how this case is having an effect on the lives of others. Honestly, I a horrible enough at times (like these) to think I almost would like him in with the regular prisoners, just so long as the prisoners knew he used to be a corrections officer. I know. I need to go repent again.
53 posted on 09/03/2003 2:30:45 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy (Are we really arrogant? Or are they just jealous of us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy
Maybe someone on this thread could get the word out to help me. There are many families who are effected by this and would like to be able to speak out. I have heard a few on other boards (got to talk to that one) and on the radio. The only problem is whenever I mention to Victim Witness or the paper that I would like to have these families to be able to voluntarily contact me, so we can have some grass roots group for victim's rights, the response is either "that's a good idea" or "I understand how frustrating it is", then they sit on their hands. I understand if other families don't want to talk, but they aren't even being given the information. ANy suggestions on how to get the word out there. Or if anyone knows someone Ring v. Arizona has an effect on, please post to my freepmail. I am sick of the victim's being forgotten. They were real people too.
54 posted on 09/03/2003 2:37:47 PM PDT by HungarianGypsy (Are we really arrogant? Or are they just jealous of us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson