To: bedolido
...and rekindled the debate about how much religion can legally be a part of government.
How much religion can legally be a part of government? You have to shake your head at prose like this, and wonder at the naivete` of the writer. I didn't know there was a quota on religion posed by the government. Perhaps someone can educate the writer about constitutional law.
9 posted on
09/02/2003 11:00:11 AM PDT by
Noachian
(Legislation Without Representation Is Tyranny)
To: Noachian
"How much religion can legally be a part of government? You have to shake your head at prose like this, and wonder at the naivete` of the writer. I didn't know there was a quota on religion posed by the government. Perhaps someone can educate the writer about constitutional law."The author probably also believes that disenfranchizement of military voters is legal, while possible the disenfranchizement of an unknown theoretical number of black voters is ILlegal, and also that Democrats can glom voter intent by banging a pregnant-chad-laden ballot on their foreheads a hundred times is a valid method for counting votes to choose a president.
11 posted on
09/02/2003 11:31:26 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson