Skip to comments.
Boeing gets $188M Air Force contract for small diameter bomb
St. Louis Business Journal ^
| Aug 28, 2003
| staff
Posted on 09/02/2003 9:19:23 AM PDT by ladtx
Boeing has received a contract worth $188 million from the U.S. Air Force to continue development and production of the small diameter bomb.
Boeing will build an estimated 24,000 weapons and 2,000 carriages over the next 10 years at its production facility in St. Charles, Mo. The small diameter bomb will be used on the F-15E, the F/A-22, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems and almost all other weapons platforms.
The program is expected to generate up to $2.5 billion in sales to the Air Force, Boeing said.
The size of the bomb, 70 inches long and 7.5 inches wide, allows for each aircraft to carry a larger weapons load. Carriages hold four of the bombs and quadruple the number of possible targets destroyed per combat sortie, Boeing said.
Chicago-based Boeing Co.'s (NYSE: BA) Integrated Defense Systems unit, its largest subsidiary, is based in St. Louis and is the area's second-largest employer.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boeing; bomb; contracts; defensespending; lockheed; nationalsecurity; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
More tools for the war on terror.
1
posted on
09/02/2003 9:19:24 AM PDT
by
ladtx
To: ladtx
Just the right size for Little Kim in NK, eh ?
To: ladtx
Looks like the purpose of this type of bomb would be more precision and less collateral damage. Hmmm -- less collateral damage, a term the dems did not want to hear.
3
posted on
09/02/2003 9:21:01 AM PDT
by
ladtx
( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
To: ladtx
The size of the bomb, 70 inches long and 7.5 inches wideOh my! How did they get my personal stats????
And I know I'm cool, but "the BOMB"???
4
posted on
09/02/2003 9:21:15 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: ladtx
5
posted on
09/02/2003 9:26:18 AM PDT
by
David1
To: ladtx
Seems like a simple enough idea. Wonder why they didn't do this earlier?
6
posted on
09/02/2003 9:28:47 AM PDT
by
Imal
(The World According to Imal: http://imal.blogspot.com)
To: honeygrl; najida; cjshapi; Cathryn Crawford; Xenalyte; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Shoot. I meant this as a shout-out to my homies. Let's try that again....
The size of the bomb, 70 inches long and 7.5 inches wide
Oh my! How did they get my personal stats????
And I know I'm cool, but "the BOMB"???
7
posted on
09/02/2003 9:29:14 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: David1
Note: the B-2 carries 16 2000 lb bombs, 80 500 lb bombs. that would mean 160 each 250 lb bombs. Why send a fighter when a few bomber sorties (and we are talking about bombing) will quickly deplete your target database.
8
posted on
09/02/2003 9:29:36 AM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Bigamy is one wife too many. So is monogamy, or is it monotony?)
To: Imal
Actually they used smaller bombs during the first world war, but had to drop so many of them that they went to bigger bombs during wwII after the planes could handle the load. Still, 1000 plane raids were necessary to get enough bombs on target.
Now bombs are being guided, and initially the packages were developed for existing bombs. Now special bombs are being made for the packages. Evolution takes time. As GPS jammers become more effective, the bombs will get bigger again.
9
posted on
09/02/2003 9:33:07 AM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Bigamy is one wife too many. So is monogamy, or is it monotony?)
To: Lazamataz
The size of the bomb, 70 inches long and 7.5 inches wide Oh my! How did they get my personal stats????
And I know I'm cool, but "the BOMB"???
7.5 inch diameter corresponds to a 24-inch waist.
Is this your way of telling us you're built like Wonder Woman....?
10
posted on
09/02/2003 9:37:01 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: r9etb
7.5 inch diameter corresponds to a 24-inch waist. Is this your way of telling us you're built like Wonder Woman....?That's not the stat I was talking about.
11
posted on
09/02/2003 9:38:53 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: Lazamataz
Laz, you must have quite an inseam measurement!
12
posted on
09/02/2003 9:40:40 AM PDT
by
cjshapi
To: ladtx
When asked about outsourcing American jobs to India, the CEO of Boeing said, "Americans are not entitled to their standard of living".
Just because Boeing makes aircraft does not entitle it to benefit from contracts funded with taxpayer dollars. Boeing doesn't deserve this contract and should never have even been considered for it.
To: Lazamataz
That's not the stat I was talking about. I suppose you know that, diameter-wise, you're hoping to attract women with something that promises to cause them considerably more pain than child-birth.....?
14
posted on
09/02/2003 9:41:39 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: Lazamataz
Warning: Objects in the mirror appear considerably larger than than they really are.
15
posted on
09/02/2003 9:47:55 AM PDT
by
Imagine
( A)
To: r9etb
I suppose you know that, diameter-wise, you're hoping to attract women with something that promises to cause them considerably more pain than child-birth.....?It's telescoping and changes widths to accomodate.
16
posted on
09/02/2003 9:53:54 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: Imagine
Warning: Objects in the mirror appear considerably larger than than they really are.LOL!
17
posted on
09/02/2003 9:54:18 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: cjshapi
Laz, you must have quite an inseam measurement!Either that, or I am such a freakin' liar.
18
posted on
09/02/2003 9:55:03 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
To: ladtx
The goal is to reduce civilian casualties until the Dems accuse the Pres. of targeted assassination.
He can't win with them.
19
posted on
09/02/2003 9:59:52 AM PDT
by
ko_kyi
To: Lazamataz
Well, there is always that possibility. Actually it seems to me that dragging along a 70 inch one would get pretty cumbersome.
20
posted on
09/02/2003 10:02:20 AM PDT
by
cjshapi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson