Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Productivity [Interesting Info on Real Earnings Until 2000]
Scientific American ^ | May 2000 | Roger Doyle

Posted on 09/01/2003 11:43:10 PM PDT by 1rudeboy

By the Numbers

Productivity
By Rodger Doyle

For the first time since the 1960s, U.S. productivity has been growing at an annual rate above 2.5 percent. As numbers go, this may not seem spectacular, but it has enabled the economy to sustain a very low level of unemployment--less than 5 percent in each of the past three years--while holding retail price inflation to about 2 percent a year. The late stages of most business cycles put irresistible pressure on employers to raise wages, which ordinarily leads to increased prices and in turn acts to slow or stop the expansion. But in the present circumstances, employers can raise wages without upping prices because of increased productivity.

According to the President's Council of Economic Advisers, about half of the increase in productivity since 1995 is explained by increased capital equipment--particularly computers and software--plus increased productivity in the computer-manufacturing industry. The remaining half of the productivity increase may reflect new efficiencies from Internet use by business and the normally greater efficiency of employees during periods of high demand.

The better educated benefited the most from the rise in productivity. Average hourly earnings in private, nonagricultural business increased in real terms by about 16 percent during the past 40 years, but professionals did better: physicians, for example, enjoyed an increase in real earnings of 33 percent in the same period. One way of looking at the benefits of rising productivity is to compare various family income groups. The top 5 percent of families had an increase in income of 129 percent in real terms from 1960 to 1998, while the middle fifth had an increase of 54 percent and the bottom fifth only 38 percent. Family income went up not only because productivity was greater for other reasons, such as the increasing number of wives taking jobs outside the home. The average real income of working Americans, as the chart shows, increased beginning in 1995--undoubtedly made possible by the spurt in productivity over the same period.

In 1950 northwestern Europe, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP) per hour worked, was half as efficient as the U.S., but now it is about 90 percent as efficient, and a few countries, including France, were marginally ahead as of 1997. The U.S., however, is far ahead of France--and every other country--in terms of GDP per capita, in part because Americans put in longer hours and because proportionately more are economically active. In France and Germany, for example, only 48 percent of the civilian working-age population actually worked in 1997, as compared with 64 percent in the U.S. Lower labor-force participation and high unemployment rates, as exist in much of Europe, suggest that the least skilled are excluded and so do not drag down productivity. By comparison, the U.S. economy has created millions of jobs for less skilled and presumably less productive workers. Few, however, would disparage low unemployment for this or any other reason.


SOURCES: CHART: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Average hourly earnings are deflated by the consumer price index to compute real hourly earnings. Adjustment by another widely used index, the GDP deflator, would have resulted in a trend line somewhat closer to that of nonfarm output per hour.

MAP: "International Comparisons of Labor Productivity and Per Capita Income." Bart van Ark and Robert H. McGuckin in Monthly Labor Review, 1999, pages 34–41; July 1999. Available data are shown for all members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: earnings; economy; income; real; wages
Interesting article, and not only because of the date it was published, but because it claims that "[a]verage hourly earnings in private, nonagricultural business increased in real terms by about 16 percent during the past 40 years . . . ."
1 posted on 09/01/2003 11:43:10 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Interesting info.

Thanks for posting it.
2 posted on 09/01/2003 11:52:18 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
There's a flaw. Consumer price index does not include taxes. I once crunched the same numbers for a laugh and I included taxes. There was no earnings increase for the average person.
3 posted on 09/02/2003 12:00:16 AM PDT by Victoria_R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria_R
"Consumer price index does not include taxes. I once crunched the same numbers for a laugh and I included taxes. There was no earnings increase for the average person. "

==

Good point!
4 posted on 09/02/2003 12:02:58 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Victoria_R; FairOpinion
Personally, I don't know what the standard for calculation is . . . even this author includes two. But honestly, if taxes are the primary reason for real-wage stagnation, or worse, and real wages would rise in the absence of tax-considerations, then what of the paleo-protectionists' central argument that free-trade is the source of a decline in our standard-of-living? One has nothing to do with the other (and I posted this data for the paleos' benefit).
5 posted on 09/02/2003 12:12:30 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You got it. By the way PERSONAL INCOME has risen, and that does include taxes.

And free trade has increased the standard of living, and as I HAVE SAID HERE FOR TWO YEARS, productivity is the driving force behind economic growth. Low taxes help, by all means. I have no problem with MASSIVE tax cuts and budget cuts too (the two are not necessarily linked), but ultimately Saw's Law says that is you have productivity increases, you will have economic/job growth. It has always happened, because supply (caused by higher productivity) creates its own demand.

6 posted on 09/02/2003 6:20:10 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
That would explain why noone is willing to take low wage, manual labor jobs in places like CA.
7 posted on 09/02/2003 6:37:21 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (I was lerned in Pubik Skool!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
>And free trade has increased the standard of living, and >as I HAVE SAID HERE FOR TWO YEARS

you're damn right
8 posted on 09/02/2003 7:20:01 AM PDT by Norse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
and real wages would rise in the absence of tax-considerations, then what of the paleo-protectionists' central argument that free-trade is the source of a decline in our standard-of-living?

Government has to get its revenue from someplace.

9 posted on 09/02/2003 7:55:22 AM PDT by Tauzero (My reserve bank chairman can beat up your reserve bank chairman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Have you ever read a novel titled Camp of the Saints? This thread is the virtual equivalent of the professor's house on the hill.
10 posted on 09/02/2003 12:27:26 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Please take a close look at the graph at the top of this thread. I have an opponent who claims that it shows real wages have fallen since 1970. I claim that it shows that the rate of increase in real wages rates leveled-off after 1970 has has begun increasing again. What gives? If I'm wrong, then I owe someone an apology.
11 posted on 05/22/2004 7:28:09 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson