[blam]

Timely deaths, no?

[StatesEnemy]

Why aren't we going after Saudi Arabia?
Why aren't we patrolling our borders?
Why aren't we banning the export of technology to China?

Because big $$$ is more important than actual security.

[farmfriend]

Timely deaths, no?

That's just what I was thinking. Funny how those things come in 3s.

[nuconvert]

Gee, why does wahabi come to mind?

Is this supposed to be a revelation?

[Cicero]

It's one of the big unanswered questions. Will Bush do the right thing with the Saudis when the time comes, or won't he? No one can be sure--and of course he'd be an idiot to tip his hand until he plays his cards.

From the time of his campaign I've given Bush the benefit of the doubt, always realizing that you never can be absolutely sure what any politician can do. I'm hopeful that Bush will do the right thing with the Saudis in due course.

If that's his plan, then it would be typical of his masterly political style to let himself be dragged into doing into what he wants to do by the media and the public. That's the way he plays the game.

[river rat]

"....and the prince died of a heart attack, aged 43, last year.

Two other princes named in the book as al-Qa'eda paymasters also died within a week of Prince Ahmed."

Killed to silence, or to punish?

Saudi Arabia and Wahhabism is the enemy...Don't look away.

Semper Fi

[Mo1]

The effect of Posner's claims may be largely diplomatic: there is no corroborating evidence for his claims, and the prince died of a heart attack, aged 43, last year.

He has no proof to back up this claim he makes???

HELLO .. sometimes it helps to have some kind of proof