Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea Says U.S. Policy Endangers Talks
Kansas City Star / AP ^ | 8/28/2003 | AP Staff

Posted on 08/28/2003 11:03:25 PM PDT by ex-Texan

N. Korea Says U.S. Policy Endangers Talks

SEOUL, South Korea - North Korea said Friday that prospects for another round of nuclear talks were in jeopardy because of inflexibility on the part of U.S. negotiators, a South Korean news agency reported.

"As the United States refuses to express intentions to switch over its hostile policy against North Korea, prospects for the next round of talks have fallen into danger," said KCNA, the North's news agency. KCNA was quoted by Yonhap, a South Korean agency.

The comments came at a six-nation meeting in China that included representatives of the United States, South Korea, China, Japan and Russia as well as North Korea. The meeting resumed Friday.

A U.S. government official said in Washington on Thursday that North Korea rejected U.S. disarmament plans, saying it will prove to the world that it possesses nuclear weapons by carrying out a nuclear test.

According to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, North Korean Deputy Foreign Minister Kim Yong Il also said in Beijing that his country has the means to deliver nuclear weapons, an apparent reference to its highly-developed missile program.

"The United States said that the next round of talks can continue if we express our willingness to give up our nuclear plans at this time," KCNA said.

"That means they plan to act after we dismantle," the agency said. It was unclear what North Korea meant by "act," though it could refer to the possibility of U.S. willingness to negotiate, or North Korean suspicions that Washington seeks to undermine the North through economic pressure or even military action.

"This kind of demand is beyond common sense. We cannot but point out the real intentions of the United States," the agency said.

"Through the six-way talks, it has become more clear that the United States is pursuing a hostile policy to stifle the DPRK and is seeking to dismantle us by pressure," KCNA said. DPRK stands for Democratic People's Republic of Korea, North Korea's official name.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: beijingsummit; northkorea
"Through the six-way talks, it has become more clear that the United States is pursuing a hostile policy to stifle the DPRK and is seeking to dismantle us by pressure," KCNA said."

No sh!t Sherlock -- they deserve to be locked and confined without food or any U.S. inside their borders. 'Nuff said.

1 posted on 08/28/2003 11:03:26 PM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Ping!
2 posted on 08/28/2003 11:42:01 PM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Free! Read my historical romance novels online at http://Writing.Com/authors/vdavisson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Gazeta Ru ran with a short item saying a joint doc/statement was to issued, which now has apparently failed.

16:20

Russia says N. Korea document to be signed Friday




Russia's representative at talks on the North Korean nuclear crisis said on Thursday all six sides had basically agreed on a document to be signed on Friday and planned to meet again by October, Itar-Tass reported.

"It is practically agreed, and most likely will be accepted tomorrow," Tass quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Losyukov as saying after a second day of talks in Beijing. "There is a mutual understanding that we should not drag our feet on the next round of negotiations and we should carry them out in the next two months," he said, adding that the next round was also likely to be in Beijing. //Reuters

3 posted on 08/28/2003 11:58:14 PM PDT by witnesstothefall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Anyone want to guess where all the missles we used to point at the USSR are now pointing? Has anyone explained the concept of unilateral (in this case) assured destruction to these blackmailing SOBs?
4 posted on 08/29/2003 6:03:43 AM PDT by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
Thank you for thinking of ME!
5 posted on 08/29/2003 6:13:49 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Saddam Had No Taepodong-II nuke ICBMs capable of hitting the World's Largest & 2nd Largest Economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The fact is, (and get ready for Asian mutual contradictions again):

THEY ARE BLUFFING

and

THEY ARE SERIOUS

One way to manage this is to engineer and announce a Northeast Asia Non-Proliferation and Security (Monroe II) Doctrine, that clearly stipulates that any nuclear weapon test(s) by the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea is deemed unacceptable, and that which is either announced by the Pyongyang regime, reported upon later by them, or independently verified by the United States, Japan or South Korea, as having taken place, immediate commencement of a comprehensive maritime blockade of North Korea will take place, whereupon all sea commerce will be forced to a standstill.

That is, if we are really serious about this so-called RED LINE that the Administration drew with respect to North Korean nuclear weapons, about a year ago.

6 posted on 08/29/2003 6:25:21 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (Saddam Had No Taepodong-II nuke ICBMs capable of hitting the World's Largest & 2nd Largest Economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
They would much rather deal with the last administration's approach:

Albright_Jong-Il.jpg

Tasty Manatees
7 posted on 08/29/2003 7:27:22 AM PDT by TastyManatees (http://www.tastymanatees.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
We need to deal with North Korea before the 2004 elections.

Bush needs to go for broke and play poker.

Either we succeed and force Chia Head's hand or we fail and we have to "get medieval".

Either way, its better to do this with Bush at the helm than to leave the mess for his possible replacement. A pre-emptive strike might cost Bush an election, but save our country.

8 posted on 08/29/2003 8:33:46 AM PDT by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

BUMP!
9 posted on 08/30/2003 8:09:59 PM PDT by Orion78 (FREE IRAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson