Posted on 08/28/2003 10:45:58 PM PDT by Timesink
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:41:06 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...
USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup poll results Below are the results of the latest USATODAY/CNN/Gallup poll asking Americans their opinion on terrorism and the Patriot Act. 1. How worried are you that you or someone in your family will become a victim of terrorism -- very worried, somewhat worried, not too worried, or not worried at all?
2. How likely is it that there will be further acts of terrorism in the United States over the next several weeks -- very likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or not at all likely?
3. How likely is it that there will be further acts of terrorism in your community over the next several weeks -- very likely, somewhat likely, not too likely, or not at all likely?
4. How much confidence do you have in the U.S. government to protect its citizens from future terrorist attacks -- a great deal, a fair amount, not very much, or none at all?
5. Just your best guess, do you think there are terrorists associated with Osama bin Laden who are currently in the United States and have the resources to launch a major terrorist attack against the U.S. at any time, or not?
6. In the next few years, do you think the United States efforts against terrorism will or will not require the U.S. to send troops to fight wars in other countries as it did in Iraq and Afghanistan?
7. Do you think each of the following is likely or not likely to happen in the United States in the next 10 years? A. A terrorist attack using a chemical or biological weapon
B. A terrorist attack using a nuclear weapon
C. Suicide bombing attacks against buildings or other public places
8. Do you think this is likely to happen within the next six months, within the next year, within the next two to five years, or within the next six to ten years? A. A terrorist attack using a chemical or biological weapon
B. A terrorist attack using a nuclear weapon
C. Suicide bombing attacks against buildings or other public places
9. Which comes closer to your view: the government should take all steps necessary to prevent additional acts of terrorism in the U.S. even if it means your basic civil liberties would be violated, (or) the government should take steps to prevent additional acts of terrorism but not if those steps would violate your basic civil liberties?
10. Do you think the Bush administration has gone too far, has been about right, or has not gone far enough in restricting peoples civil liberties in order to fight terrorism?
11. As you may know, shortly after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, a law called the Patriot Act was passed which makes it easier for the federal government to get information on suspected terrorists through court-ordered wiretaps and searches. How familiar are you with the Patriot Act very familiar, somewhat familiar, not too familiar, or not at all familiar?
12. Based on what you have read or heard, do you think the Patriot Act goes too far, is about right, or does not go far enough in restricting people's civil liberties in order to fight terrorism?
Results are based on telephone interviews with 1,009 national adults, aged 18+, conducted August 25-26, 2003. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±3 percentage points. |
Who are they talking to? Seriously concerned? Give this a break, most people aren't thinking about terrorist attacks in the U.S., just walk around and talk to 'em.
Whether it is a "lone nut" or not, there are still many loose nuts who have made attempts to strike.
Certainly there have been bombings around the world. We've had snipers, airport shootings, and a kid who flew a plane into a building deliberately.
We may not have even heard about everything. Who knows if there were other plane crashes, the Tampa one was downplayed. We didn't get to see the suicide note until after the Super Bowl because it contained a warning of more violence at the Super Bowl in 2002.
The snipers operated for awhile before they went public with their shootings.
We don't think that the power outage was a terrorist act. We don't think that the recent email virus was a terrorist act (in the Islamofascist sense). There could be other cyberattacks.
We may never hear about some failed plans. I don't want to see any futher attacks in the US. I also won't live in fear of a future attack. Nothing I can do will protect me from such an attack; they are senseless attacks on civilians. It could happen at a nightclub or shopping mall just as easily as it could happen at an airport. Look at Indonesia. Look at Israel. Look at Germany.
The difference between an attack on America and some of these other countries is our response.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.