Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politics of Porn: Justice Department Launches Long-Anticipated War on Obscenity
ABC News ^ | 9-28-03 | Jake Tapper

Posted on 08/28/2003 2:34:00 PM PDT by Houmatt

Rob Zicari and his fiancée, Janet Romano, are facing the first major federal prosecution for obscenity in more than a decade. They face 10 counts relating to the production and distribution by mail of obscene materials, and each could get 50 years in prison and a fine of up to $2.5 million.

"We're facing more time than the guy that they just arrested that was trying to sell the surface-to-air missile," said Zicari.

On April 8, law enforcement seized five movies produced by Zicari's California-based company, Extreme Associates, which bills itself as "The Hardest Hard Core on the Web."

One of the confiscated movies, Forced Entry, features three graphic scenes of women being spat upon, raped and murdered. Extreme Teens #24 has adult women dressed up and acting like little girls in various hard-core pornographic scenes. We can't even tell you the title of one of the films.

‘There’s Nothing Wrong With What We Do’

Most Americans would probably find the content of the films disgusting. Zicari doesn't disagree — but he says to each his own.

"There's nothing wrong with what we do," said Zicari. "[W]e're not drug dealers or murderers, you know. We make movies. That's it."

But for the Bush administration, that's enough.

"Obscenities have always been a priority of the attorney general," said Mary Beth Buchanan, U.S. attorney for western Pennsylvania. "[A]nd he has asked each U.S. attorney to make that our priority as well."

Buchanan is the lead prosecutor on the case against Zacari. So jurors in Pittsburgh will have to decide if Zicari's movies fit the legal definition of obscenity.

"The material depicted in the videotapes produced by Extreme Associates is extremely vile, degrading and extremely offensive to women," Buchanan said.

The nature of Extreme Associates' movies makes it an ideal target for Attorney General John Ashcroft's Justice Department's opening salvo in its long-anticipated war on obscenity.

Ashcroft had planned on launching the anti-obscenity initiative back in 2001, but was sidetracked by the 9/11 terror attacks. Now the issue is once again a priority for the Justice Department.

"I can tell you that as long as I'm chief of the section, the section will work very hard to prosecute obscenity cases along with child pornography, another important focus for us," said Andrew Oosterbaan, chief of the Justice Department's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section.

"This is about a priority for the country. This is something the country wants prosecuted and therefore we're prosecuting it."

Hard to Watch = Difficult to Defend

The Justice Department has chosen its target wisely. Zicari's films are difficult to watch — which may make them difficult to defend.

To meet the legal definition of obscenity, a film has to depict sex in an offensive and prurient fashion with no artistic value. It is this subjectivity that worries some in the industry.

Paul Fishbein, president of Adult Video News, a trade journal for the adult entertainment industry, is well aware of the conflict presented by the films of Extreme Associates. "They're horrible, unwatchable, disgusting, aberrant movies that I'd have to vote were not obscenity because the First Amendment is pure and has to remain pure," he said.

"The funny thing about my business is I don't force it on anybody," said Zicari. "The only people that are going to be forced to watch my movies are the 12 people that sit on that jury."

The Bush administration says that overall, adult films today are far more offensive than ever before. It places much of the blame with the Clinton administration for, it claims, not making obscenity prosecutions a priority.

People inside the multibillion-dollar porn industry say community standards have become more accepting in recent years, pointing to the success of Boogie Nights, a drama about 1970s adult filmmakers, several years ago.

Pleasing the Christian Right

Many anti-obscenity activists are members of the Christian right, a group that generally admires Ashcroft and is a key constituency in President Bush's re-election campaign.

Zicari vows that he'll fight this to the end. But it's unlikely that his prosecution will be the last.

"The current prosecution of Extreme Associates should put the pornography industry on notice that the U.S. Department of Justice is vigorously enforcing the federal obscenity laws," said Buchanan.

Zicari and Romano were arraigned Wednesday in Pittsburgh. Both pleaded not guilty.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pornography
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-259 next last
To: thoughtomator
No thinking could be more dangerous than the misogynistic attitude that produces such hateful garbage.

If you have no quarrel with the repeated onscreen depiction of rape and murder in a film created for a specific audience (those who view sexually explicit material), I can only wonder about you.

21 posted on 08/28/2003 2:53:47 PM PDT by Houmatt (Hey NY Freepers! Houmatt is here! Look upon my works, ye mighty, and despair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Just look at history. The first rape and the first murder didn't occur until the camera was invented.

The only sensible thing to do is to outlaw cameras, or at least issue a 5 day waiting period! Of course if we outlaw cameras, only outlaws will...

22 posted on 08/28/2003 2:55:18 PM PDT by proust (Cthulhu for president! Why vote for the lesser of two evils?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Orangedog
I agree with you. I will be sleeping a lot more peacfully tonight now that I know the serious problems have ben put to rest.
23 posted on 08/28/2003 2:56:48 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt; thoughtomator
No thinking could be more dangerous than the misogynistic attitude that produces such hateful garbage.

Oh my! Dangerous thoughts. We need the government to police those thoughts! [/sarcasm]

24 posted on 08/28/2003 2:58:24 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Houmatt
Here is a nice compiled bibliography of published material that studies the rape/violence/porn connection for anyone interested.
26 posted on 08/28/2003 2:58:47 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
"One of the confiscated movies, Forced Entry, features three graphic scenes of women being spat upon, raped and murdered."

Something you may have overlooked (ignored) in crafting your response.

So, how many scenes of women (and men) being brutally assaulted and murdered were there in candidate-for-governor Arnold's seminal work, "The Terminator," or the critically acclaimed film "Pulp Fiction," or in "Natural Born Killers," or any number of other Hollywood films?

27 posted on 08/28/2003 2:59:03 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Does this mean that the War on Drugs is over? And what's the next "War on  (Fill in the blank)  " gonna be? I don't want to fall behind.
28 posted on 08/28/2003 2:59:04 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
"Obscenity" is simply about stopping others from enjoying what you don't.

or you are afraid that you might enjoy if you were not protected

29 posted on 08/28/2003 2:59:50 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
"No thinking could be more dangerous than the misogynistic attitude that produces such hateful garbage."

"No thinking could be more dangerous..."

WTF!!
Gee, just offhand I'd say that thinking that it would be nice to use biowarfare against us might be more dangerous

Gee, just off hand I'd think that the idea that the borders are undefended and a terrorist or a couple of million illegals can waltz in might be more dangerous.

But, golly that's just me.
30 posted on 08/28/2003 2:59:50 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Not simply by that description can one tell if it's necessarily obscene.

That's why John Ashcroft personally watched every disgusting frame of that movie...twice!

31 posted on 08/28/2003 3:01:34 PM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
The apathy being carried by most of the posters here just stuns me.

I wonder what it would take to get these people to understand?

We all know men who watch porn are often moved to duplicate scenes from the films they watch (just look at the Family Research Council and AFA websites for proof of that), why is it such a stretch to see these people duplicate these rape/murder scenes? And what if the woman in question is their sister? Their daughter? Does any of that matter to them at all?

32 posted on 08/28/2003 3:02:33 PM PDT by Houmatt (Hey NY Freepers! Houmatt is here! Look upon my works, ye mighty, and despair!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
Perhaps some good can come of this. What if we tricked the DOJ into thinking that all of those illegals sneaking across the border were really porn stars? They'd seal off the border before you could say "three-way"!
33 posted on 08/28/2003 3:03:02 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
But, let 'em in if they are built like a brick hacienda!
34 posted on 08/28/2003 3:04:21 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
An exception for... ahem... humanitarian reasons?
35 posted on 08/28/2003 3:07:42 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Yes, I heard there was a need for pole workers.
36 posted on 08/28/2003 3:08:46 PM PDT by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
And what if the woman in question is their sister? Their daughter? Does any of that matter to them at all?

Not getting the response you hoped for, so now you're going down the incest/molestation route? Predictable. How many more posts before you bring up necrophilia and bestiality?

37 posted on 08/28/2003 3:08:54 PM PDT by zoyd (Hi, I'm with the government. We're going to make you like your neighbor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Anyone who "gets off" by watching a porn that has women being raped and murdered has a serious disconnect.. while I'm sure they're a few people who can watch it.. like it.. and know it's wrong in real life.. i'm sure those people are few and far between. I reference you to a movie called "8mm" with Nicholas Gage... extremely hard to watch.
38 posted on 08/28/2003 3:09:30 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: Houmatt
I take it you didn't like the movies. Well, no one forced you to watch them, did they?

It is precisely their kind of filth that creates and feeds violent sex offenders.--Not if you don't watch them.

You, of all people, should know.

40 posted on 08/28/2003 3:10:02 PM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson