Replies

>> Even most of the stark raving morons who voted for her perverted husband wouldn't vote to put her in charge of national security in times like these. <<

Don't be too sure about that. I remember hearing a quote posted on FR from a Hitlery supporter. Something to the effect of "We love Hillary, we don't care about the truth."

There are way too many libs lacking brains. They will vote for the shrew if it runs.

Don't be too sure about that.

It's amazing the number of people who think she's terrific here

Get a grip.

She is not "Commander in Chief" material.

Klintoon/Gore got White women to vote for them.

They are not going to vote for HRC to protect their kids.

SHRILLARY! doesn't stand a chance.

Imagine her reviewing troops, or landing on an aircraft carrier?.

Theres a war on for godsakes.

She'll do worse than Dukakis.

There are way too many libs lacking brains. They will vote for the shrew if it runs.

Remember how angry we were in 2000 after eight years of Bill Clinton, and the thought of a scumbag like Al Gore continuing the Era of Sleaze? Remember how that galvanized us? Remember how angry we were in 2002 after the hideous spectacle of the Paul Wellstone Memori-rally, and how it galvanized us? (And insured that we won both times?)

Now think about Hillary Clinton as an official candidate for president. The GOP base would be at least two orders of magnitude MORE galvanized in such a case, and millions upon millions of us would fight like hell to defeat her. There is no way the RATS could stir up anywhere near as much passion for Hillary as we could against her. They may love and worship her, but they do not fear her. To them, she would be just another candidate to get elected. To us, it would be a fight to save the nation itself. Which side do you think would end up fighting harder?