Warning – Serious Item! U10 Commandmensts judge Moore is an egomaniacal huckster)

ESPN Page 2 ^ | August 26, 2003 | Gregg Easterbrook

[quidnunc]

Knowledgable people strongly suspect the Judge Moore is using this incident as a steppingstone to higher office — most likely the Alabama governorship.

[Paleo Conservative]

ESPN columnists ought to stick to sports. If I wanted to read leftist social commentary, I would read Salon.com or DU.

[RAY]

The writer is simply another egghead AH.

[RAY]

The writer is simply another egghead AH.

[Catspaw]

I'll take this guy with a grain of salt. He said Favre played for Green Bay for his entire career. I guess he forgot we (meaning me & my beloved Green Bay Packers) got Favre in a trade from Atlanta.

[mrsmith]

"Knowledgeable people" are avoiding the issues and attacking personalities?

Christians can "do" public relations.

[FReepaholic]

>>...So presumably Judge Moore also thinks that if he sentences a man to prison, the man can declare that the interpretation might be wrong and walk free?...<<

Wrong. A jury convicts and a judge applies the sentence according to statutory guidelines.

Of course, the convicted can always appeal but not just "walk free".

As mentioned in a previous post, ESPN should stick to sports.

[Tribune7]

Republican Gov. Bob Riley is risking his political neck to campaign for tax-law changes that would increase taxes . . .

I think this writer has a perspective that pre-supposes a dislike for conservatism.

[Sloth]

Since, Moore continued, an interpretation can be wrong, therefore he may defy a judicial order. So presumably Judge Moore also thinks that if he sentences a man to prison, the man can declare that the interpretation might be wrong and walk free? It's exactly the same logic.

What is Mr. Easterbrook's position on the Dred Scott case?

[TommyDale]

"...Judge Moore is using this incident as a steppingstone to higher office — most likely the Alabama governorship."

And the problem with this would be.....?

[Phantom Lord]

Why is ESPN writing on such matters?

[50sDad]

Martin Luther King, the publicity-seeker who led the "March on Washington"...

[Stone Mountain]

And the problem with this would be.....?

That he is resisting a court order in order to gain himself publicity he otherwise wouldn't be able to receive and flaunting the law he has sworn to uphold in the process. And not because of the greater public good, but for personal political gain. At least, that's MY problem with it...

[ladtx]

Knowledgable people strongly suspect the Judge Moore is using this incident as a steppingstone to higher office ...

My problem with that assertion is that why would he choose such a divisive steppingstone? Seems to me he would choose some other vehicle that is not of such "hot-button" proportions unless he made a grave tactical error in not thinking it would create such a furor.

[sasafras]

Agree - leave the bias reporting and lieing to the professionals at the NY Times. ESPN should focus on sports.

[Jim Robinson]

"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion," does not apply to him because "I am not Congress." Drag this incompetent lunatic out of the court quickly, please. Anyone with entry-level knowledge of Constitutional law knows that the 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, was intended to extend the Bill of Rights to state governments; that a 1937 Supreme Court decision specifically declared that the First Amendment binds state officials like Judge Moore.

Judge Moore made no law and he violated no law.

[quidnunc]

ladtx wrote: My problem with that assertion is that why would he choose such a divisive steppingstone? …

Because he did it before.

Judge Moore was a local judge who a few years ago defied a federal court order to remove the 10 Commandments from the wall of his courtroom.

The case received much attention in the news media.

He parlayed the notoriety he got from this incident into a successful election campaign for chief justice of the Alabama supreme court.

[ohioman]

ESPN columnists are all liberal scum. It is that simple.

[quidnunc]

Jim Robinson wrote: Judge Moore made no law and he violated no law.

Judge Moore took an oath to uphold the Constitution.

It is settled law (See Marbury vs Madison) that the federal courts in general and SCOTUS in particular are the final arbiters on the US Constitution.

[Jim Robinson]

He did not violate his oath and he did not violate the Constitution.