Not sure what you mean here. Could you elaborate?
You can call me a hypocrite... fine.
Sorry, I didn't mean you specifically. But lets find out: Do you support the fed interfering with states determining their own assisted suicide laws?
If I cannot spread the word of God freely then what else is there?
In this Commandments case, the question is not whether private citizens can spread the Word freely. That is not even up for debate. You can and should be able to put the Commandments on your car, on your shirt, on a sign, on the radio, on TV, on your front lawn, on the internet, ad infinitum...
The question is whether the Government can spread the Word. This is quite a different issue, unless you contend that you cannot spread the Word without the government's help. Is that the case?
You as much as admitted its a state/federal issue yet you are against the display of the monument.
Thats an incorrect stance because as I have said, the "state", hasnt established any particular religion nor has it prevented anyone from practicing theirs.
The question is whether the Government can spread the Word. This is quite a different issue, unless you contend that you cannot spread the Word without the government's help. Is that the case?
Which word do you speak of? And which law has been made that is spreading it? That is the question that we must ALWAYS come back to.