Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freeeee
Not sure what you mean here. Could you elaborate?

You as much as admitted its a state/federal issue yet you are against the display of the monument.

Thats an incorrect stance because as I have said, the "state", hasnt established any particular religion nor has it prevented anyone from practicing theirs.

The question is whether the Government can spread the Word. This is quite a different issue, unless you contend that you cannot spread the Word without the government's help. Is that the case?

Which word do you speak of? And which law has been made that is spreading it? That is the question that we must ALWAYS come back to.

143 posted on 08/28/2003 12:38:36 PM PDT by smith288 (For every column Ann Coulter writes, liberals worldwide experience shrinkage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: smith288
You as much as admitted its a state/federal issue yet you are against the display of the monument.

Right. I think it's the state's right to decide - the fed should have no say. And I also think that no government at any level should promote or hinder religion. The two beliefs are not mutually exclusive.

Which word do you speak of?

In this case, the Commandments.

And which law has been made that is spreading it?

It isn't a law per se, its an administrative decision.

BTW, care to answer the question on state's rights concerning assisted suicide?

151 posted on 08/28/2003 12:47:09 PM PDT by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson