Skip to comments.
Scientists: Ocean sponge bests man-made fiber optics
CNN ^
| Sunday, August 24, 2003 Posted: 8:50 PM EDT (0050 GMT)
| (AP)
Posted on 08/28/2003 9:06:08 AM PDT by frithguild
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:02 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
AP) -- Scientists say they have identified an ocean sponge living in the darkness of the deep sea that grows thin glass fibers capable of transmitting light better than industrial fiber optic cables used for telecommunication.
The natural glass fibers also are much more flexible than manufactured fiber optic cable that can crack if bent too far.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; fiberoptics; glass; light; marinebiology; oceans; sponge; sponges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Maybe I should short fiberoptical suppliers
To: frithguild
And I suppose this marvel of nature is an accident of evolution. </sarcasm>
2
posted on
08/28/2003 9:10:37 AM PDT
by
TexasRepublic
(Liberal = Socialist = Communist)
To: frithguild
The glass fibers form a crown at its base The crown is usually found at the top not the base. This would be a pedestal.
3
posted on
08/28/2003 9:14:12 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: frithguild
4
posted on
08/28/2003 9:18:13 AM PDT
by
BubbaBasher
(Diversity is something that should be overcome, not celebrated.)
To: frithguild
bump .... who'd have thought. Animals capable of spinning glass :)
5
posted on
08/28/2003 9:18:53 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
To: PatrickHenry; VadeRetro
Ping.
6
posted on
08/28/2003 9:31:16 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: frithguild
SPOTREP
To: frithguild
Maybe I should short fiberoptical suppliers Somehow I doubt its absorbtion is as low as optical fiber, good fiber is much clearer than air.
8
posted on
08/28/2003 9:33:15 AM PDT
by
AdamSelene235
(Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Rose in RoseBear
strange science ping.
10
posted on
08/28/2003 10:28:04 AM PDT
by
Bear_in_RoseBear
(Archivist to the Hobbit Hole - 2 days to vacation)
To: kafir
If life's such a lottery ... who sets the rules ... who doubles when a loss occurs despite a good wager? Where does the insistance, endurence, resilience and belief like asphalt cracking tenacity of plants come from?
I am sorry to say that many nice things so called evolution gets rid of to its own detriment. It is not merely a question of probability of hit, but also a probability of making any substantial return on the hit compared to energy spent. Many "facts" of "evolution" are simply thermodynamicaly impossible.
Millions in advertisements will be poured to make this superior product endure over common fiber optics..... hardly a win for "natural" "evolution".
To: frithguild
Advanced telecommunications capabilities and superior absorbancy all in one.
12
posted on
08/28/2003 11:20:30 AM PDT
by
kidd
("Honey can you get off the phone? I spilled some milk")
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: kafir
does a bird violate the laws of gravity
Last I checked pengiuns don't fly and they are birds. Answer that one Mr Smarty Pants! / sarcasm
14
posted on
08/28/2003 12:02:52 PM PDT
by
lelio
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; *crevo_list; RadioAstronomer; Scully; Piltdown_Woman; ...
PING. [This ping list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]
15
posted on
08/28/2003 12:54:30 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: kafir
Evolution no more violates any laws of thermodynamics The equations balance, but evolution does indeed contravene the spirit of the second law of thermo. Entropy is reduced. There aren't many things in nature that do that.
16
posted on
08/28/2003 1:01:41 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: RightWhale
The equations balance, but evolution does indeed contravene the spirit of the second law of thermo.
I would think that the "spirit", if any, of the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that entropy always increases in a completely closed system. Evolution wouldn't seem to contravene that any more than an ice maker.
17
posted on
08/28/2003 1:22:20 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
To: RightWhale
Entropy is reduced. There aren't many things in nature that do that. You mean, like rain condensing from water vapor, salt crystallizing from solution, a lake freezing in the winter...? :-)
To: kidd
Advanced telecommunications capabilities and superior absorbancy all in one. Or maybe diapers that flash when they need changing ...
19
posted on
08/28/2003 2:06:39 PM PDT
by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
To: Right Wing Professor
like rain condensing from water vapor, salt crystallizing from solution, a lake freezing in the winter Then water evaporates again, salt dissolves again, lakes thaw again, all temporary, reversible states resulting from conditions. Evolution seems to stay evolved, and continues to evolve further. Devolution is not common, although there are examples of partial [and probably temporary] devolution: NASA, Hillary, France.
20
posted on
08/28/2003 2:07:08 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson