Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: floriduh voter; kimmie7
CNN TALKBACK LIVE Ending Life Support: Who Decides? Aired May 30, 2001 - 15:00   ET seems to say that Schiavo's testimony, that Terri would not want care, should not be allowed because he has a financial stake in the "case."
BATTISTA: How does anybody know whether a husband and wife has had that sort of discussion [about what type of care Terri would want]? There usually is never a witness to that.

ECKERT: Well, let me explain this to you. If an attorney had represented her, they would have objected to that testimony, because it comes under what's called a well-known law called the Dead Man's Statute.

You can't testify about what a dead person or incompetent person testifies to if you have financial stake. The financial stake in this case was $700,000. His second girlfriend, Ms. Shook, who they did take the deposition of, says he kept asking her what to do. He never said, "Terri, this or that," but it was all in a life context.

Should the Judge have disallowed that testimony?
2,344 posted on 09/09/2003 12:14:11 PM PDT by syriacus ( Prankin' Al Franken says---My letter to Ashcroft was not a lie...it was a prank. 9/7/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2336 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus
Please see my last post. Breaking from Pinellas County!!! Ping away if you'd like.
2,346 posted on 09/09/2003 12:18:36 PM PDT by floriduh voter (http://www.conservative-spirit.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2344 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus

NOT AT ALL, HE SOULDN'T!

Three cheers for you, my friend. Coffee's on me.

2,347 posted on 09/09/2003 12:18:41 PM PDT by kimmie7 (Stand up, stand up for Jesus ye soldiers of the Cross! Pray for Terri Schiavo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson