Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exterminating Ellsworth
The Free Radical Online ^ | Uknown | DAVID C. ADAMS

Posted on 08/27/2003 12:46:25 PM PDT by Mr.Atos

"Don't set out to raze all shrines — you'll frighten men. Enshrine mediocrity — and the shrines are razed . . . Kill by laughter. Laughter is an instrument of human joy. Learn to use it as a weapon of destruction. Turn it into a sneer. It's simple. Tell them to laugh at virtue. Don't let anything remain sacred in a man's soul — and his soul won't be sacred to him. Kill reverence and you've killed the hero in man"

In a famous speech from Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead (p. 637), arch-villain Ellsworth Toohey explains one way to seize power over an entire country...

His strategy is working.

Today, even a quick glance at newspaper headlines reveals the ongoing dismantling of freedom. It is true that the old guard of totalitarianism is largely dead — the Soviet Union is dissolved, the Berlin Wall is ten years fallen, and formerly communist countries are adopting limited market reforms. But statism is hardly beaten — it is simply reappearing in new guises, to fit the latest fashions of the masses...

What is killing freedom? Is it economic stupidity? The power of pressure groups moving unimpeded against a disinterested, complacent population? A conspiracy among the politicians and the press to maintain their modern-day Camelots?

Certainly, these are important culprits. But they are mere foot-soldiers compared to the looming commander whose spirit is the source of the disintegration of liberty: Ellsworth Toohey.

The essential evil of Ellsworth Toohey is his naked hatred of the good for being good.

Toohey was after power. And he knew that one cannot rule those of integrity, confidence, happiness, and pride. Toohey's whole aim was to destroy these qualities — to obliterate the shining spirit which represents joyous self-fulfillment. He sought to undermine a man's self-esteem and joy for life by destroying reverence. As Rand wrote in an early sketch of the character, his arsenal was not material, but spiritual, and centered on a sneer: "His chief weapon is mockery. A great, all-embracing nihilistic ridicule. Allow nothing to remain sacred in a man's soul. Earnestness towards any conception, the mere conception of earnestness itself, is the base of reverence. Allow nothing to be important to a man's spirit. Laugh it out of existence. Laughter, not as joy, but as destruction" (Journals of Ayn Rand)...

Ellsworth Toohey's greatest enemy was reverence — the precise opposite of his demoralizing, life-negating sneers. To revere a thing is to hold it in the full context of one's values, to see its immediate connection to one's highest value — one's life — and to grant it a soul-filling recognition and salute. It is a considerable task, for it presumes the achievement of self-esteem, confidence, and conscious values. But it is also the stuff of exuberant joy — the ecstatic state of being fully alive.

As such, it is absolute poison to tyrants everywhere, who thrive on the extinguished spirits of entire nations. The survival of civilization requires not just a political revolution, but a spiritual renaissance. It is either the screeching of punk rock, or the splendor of an exultant symphony. It is Andy Warhol, or it is Thomas Jefferson. It is nihilistic sneering, or a passionate reverence for being alive. Only one leads to freedom, and it will take nothing less to defeat the would-be totalitarians once and for all.

(Excerpt) Read more at freeradical.co.nz ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: ellsworth; fountainhead; nihilism; rand; toohey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: Mr.Atos
Quite true, thank you.
81 posted on 08/29/2003 2:26:14 PM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: kesg
No. Toohey was a diabolical genius. These people, for the most part, are dumber than a box of rocks.

True. But they've been given a "script" and are playing their role for the power of someone else, or some other entity.

82 posted on 08/29/2003 2:28:30 PM PDT by YoungKentuckyConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
You say so. Your welcome!

?

83 posted on 08/29/2003 3:15:28 PM PDT by Mr.Atos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
I don't think freedom is like life... It's relative.

Yes, I knew that is what you believed. I am not trying to change your mind, only pointing out how I disagree with you.

A slave is a slave and oppressions is oppression regardless of where or when you live. Freedom means being free from the coercive interference of any other individual or group of individuals in one's life. Anything short of that is not freedom.

Most people are willing to settle for something less than complete individual liberty. Some of us are not.

Hank

84 posted on 08/29/2003 5:57:38 PM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Atos
... but he is of too much value to me to abandon trying to prevent the holocaust that would follow from your prescient prognostications...

If "the people" are willing to act when action becomes necessary, perhaps the worst can be avoided. The difficult part is knowing when action becomes necessary.

85 posted on 08/29/2003 6:39:29 PM PDT by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
I don't believe man is, will be, or ever has been, free from coercive influences of any other individual or group of individuals...unless he were marooned on an uninhabited island somewhere. People are social animals, there will always be influences and interactions.
86 posted on 08/29/2003 6:40:29 PM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr; Mr.Atos
I don't believe man is, will be, or ever has been, free from coercive influences of any other individual or group of individuals...unless he were marooned on an uninhabited island somewhere. People are social animals, there will always be influences and interactions.

Man is not, never has been, or ever will be free from disease, either. Does that mean we should make our peace with it and accept it. I will continue to oppose and fight disease, as I will continue to oppose and fight tyranny and oppression.

Influence and interactions are not coercion. The man who offers me the product of his effort influences me by appealing to my desires which I am free to accept or reject. The man who threatens me with a gun influences me by appealing to my fear. He offers me no choice.

The difference is between economic influence and political influence. Economic influence works only by offering something of value, which can always be refused. Political influence works only by offering threats of force, which one is not allowed to refuse.

The difference is between violence and money. Not knowing the difference is the great moral flaw of our age and what enables people to confuse coercive force with free association and trade between individuals in a society.

See Money.

Hank

87 posted on 08/30/2003 7:34:02 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Hank Kerchief
I do not believe that disease and social influences are the same, and should probably not be treated thus.
88 posted on 09/01/2003 2:57:36 PM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson