[Physicist]

Violence is never right - but for any claim on the part of anyone in that lawsuit - plaintiff or defendant - that they didn't expect violence is unreasonable.

I certainly expected violence. Does that mean that I surrendered my legal right to be secure in my person? Or does it mean that my First Amendment right to free speech was null and void, so I should not have exercised it?

I don't know where you get the idea that if you expect a crime, you are not entitled to redress when it occurs.

[Those_Crazy_Liberals]

"I don't know where you get the idea that if you expect a crime, you are not entitled to redress when it occurs."

When an element of the wrong doing requires that you not have placed yourself in a dangerous situation, it does matter. Should you be allowed to sue someone for all your medical bills when, before you got in the car accident you didn't put your seatbelt on?

[Lazamataz]

Welcome to the wonderful whacky world of Crazy_Liberal, bud. I am quite convinced that she is a liberal disrupter intent on fomenting dissension. Who else would claim that you had it coming!??

If a woman is conservative, Crazy_Liberal would claim she wanted to be raped at the trial of her assailant.

Crazy_Liberal's comment that you had "your 15 minutes of fame" is clearly intended to provoke you. Laci Peterson also had her 15 minutes of fame, but she was assaulted horribly.

[Lazamataz]

I note that Crazy_Liberal also states that you should 'suck it up'. I suppose you should just stand there and be beaten by leftist goons, in Crazy_Liberal's Whacky World of Adventure.

Her intent is clear -- to troll you and offer provocational statements, in order to increase dissension on this forum.

Crazy_Liberal is obviously a liberal disrupter.