Nudge, nudge... Wink, wink...
Yohn said the plaintiffs "make much of the Teamsters' reputation for violence and Rendell's knowledge thereof."
But the evidence, Yohn said, showed that "Rendell believed the union's violent reputation only extended to labor disputes and he had no knowledge of the organization behaving violently during political demonstrations."
That one stretches credulity past the breaking point. Kinda like saying "but Your Honor, while I knew that pit bulls could be violent when attacking other pit bulls, I had no knowledge that they could be violent against human beings". The judge surely would have accepted that assertion, uh, right...
Pointedly so, IMHO. To my ear, it sounded like the judge was deliberately being absurd, so that nobody would miss the direction of this railroad.