Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Wow.

Tasty Manatees
1 posted on 08/26/2003 1:00:51 PM PDT by TastyManatees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TastyManatees
Is ElBaredi Arabic for Dumba$$??
2 posted on 08/26/2003 1:02:33 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (This is hughly series, please be spefic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
LOL. Good guys put down your guns first.
4 posted on 08/26/2003 1:07:00 PM PDT by Sir Gawain (When does the next Crusade start?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
I dunno why they mind bunker busters, when we could just use 1.2 megaton B83's to get the job done too.
5 posted on 08/26/2003 1:09:30 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
He's right. You have to be kind of a egocentric dipwad not to see that. We don't need em. Nobody needs em. It's hard to be a convincing preacher holding a nuclear howitzer behind your back.
7 posted on 08/26/2003 1:10:17 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
"Otherwise, we must live with the consequences. At the moment we are, at best acting, like the fire brigade. Today Iraq, tomorrow North Korea, the day after Iran. And then?" ElBaradei said."

After that, perhaps Syria, Egypt, Saidi Arabia, Sudan, Libya, Pakistan, Indonesia, Yemen etc.

Any warning from a muslim for me to disarm, is BS. They outnumber us by 3 or 4 to one.
12 posted on 08/26/2003 1:16:30 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
So that chowderhead hasn't heard about the recent agreement between the U.S. and Russia for still futher reductions in nuclear arms? Or about the closure of the Rocky Flats nuclear arms plant?
14 posted on 08/26/2003 1:20:00 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Iron Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
Hey ElBaradei, ever read this -

Article II

Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/npt/text/npt2.htm

It's called the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, you're in charge of enforcing it.

For those interested, there is some great background here -

http://www.usun-vienna.rpo.at/npt1.htm
16 posted on 08/26/2003 1:23:18 PM PDT by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
Criticizing President Bush's plan for a national missile defense shield, he said: "Then a small number of privileged countries will be under a nuclear protective shield, with the rest of the world outside."

Typical response of the leftists, America haters. Since they are completely unable to make the world safe, they propose to make therest of the world equally unsafe.

We can either live in a world of unequal freedom and happiness, vast difference in wealth, and varying degrees of safety or we can live in a world where except for a few elites, everyone is equally enslaved, miserable, poor, and unsafe.

18 posted on 08/26/2003 1:29:27 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
There's only one thing to say: What a @#$%*& idiot!
23 posted on 08/26/2003 1:49:34 PM PDT by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
Criticizing President Bush's plan for a national missile defense shield, he said: "Then a small number of privileged countries will be under a nuclear protective shield, with the rest of the world outside.

You pay, you play!

26 posted on 08/26/2003 1:52:03 PM PDT by Traffic_Can ("The future, Winston, is a boot smashing the face of humanity, forever" G. Orwell 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
Wackos do not see a difference between weapons in the hands of democratically elected governments and weapons in the hands of brutal tyrants.

The Left's reliance on moral equivocation has reached new heights.
27 posted on 08/26/2003 1:53:22 PM PDT by Guillermo (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
Here's what needs to happen, I think. There HAS to be a way to use the energy contained within nuclear weapons to generate a different form of USEFUL energy.

Electricty may be only an example. And this might even be done on the far side of the moon (by future generations), to eliminate the radioactive problem.

Maybe not today, maybe not in the next decade, but someday, all that energy could be used constructively, like in:

Isaiah chapter 2 verse 4 (excerpted)

"they shall beat their swords into plowshares"

Or hell, just use them for terror weapons against the Arabs, before they do the same to us!


30 posted on 08/26/2003 2:45:31 PM PDT by RonHolzwarth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TastyManatees
"The U.S. government demands that other nations not possess nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, it is arming itself," Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told Germany's Stern weekly.

The fact that this guy's name is Mohammed ElBaradei is laughable!

34 posted on 08/26/2003 8:37:23 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Why is the Left afraid of Arnold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson