Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
YOU were the one that mentioned it protecting the official state religions, not me. Nine of the original 13 colonies had official religions. So all I'm asking you, sir, is how did that get absolutely reversed to mean a ban on all religions? And you can cease coughing up your special ed crap, because my bookshelf is full, I have assembled and read a lot of a cd containing hundreds of thousands of pages of common law documents, and the last IQ test I took showed it near 160. So please explain the reversal.
83 posted on 08/26/2003 1:34:17 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: djf; yall
You're confused. Nothing was 'reversed' & there is no "ban on all religions".

The 1st has always applied to all levels of government, dispite the compromise wording about 'congress'.

-- Which wording, in any case, was made moot by the clear words of the 14th. -- Learn to live with them. Life liberty, & property rights are worth protecting.

In fact, why would any rational conservative WANT the states to have the power to violate our BOR's?

86 posted on 08/26/2003 1:49:27 PM PDT by tpaine ( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson