Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Old Hoosier
Quotes from another thread:

Bustamante as governor would not be good news for Bush. As a Democrat in the governor’s chair, he would inherit Davis’s fiscal problems but not his personal baggage. Accordingly, the election of a Republican Oct. 7 suddenly becomes a Bush priority. Nobody gives 2002 nominee Bill Simon a prayer, and state Sen. Tom McClintock is a very dark horse. That is why, on the day after Schwarzenegger nudged aside Riordan to become a candidate, the President declared of the five-time Mr. Universe: “I think he’d make a good governor.” (As you were saying...)

Longtime Democratic hit man Bob Mulholland talked about shooting “real bullets” at Schwarzenegger (though state chairman Torres said he cautioned him against “using that word again”).  Note that Torres didn't say he disagreed with Mulholland.

LINK

60 posted on 08/26/2003 10:27:39 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
That's a rather facile interpretation. We know Bustamante plans to hike taxes by $10 billion, and we can bet the Republicans won't give him the two-thirds vote he needs for that. So then he's going to put it on the ballot, where it will lose, and he'll be in a very weak position as governor.

Also, I don't see how a Governor Arnold helps Bush that much. He's already demonstrated that he won't know what he's doing once elected--he needs a 60-day audit to make any suggestions for spending cuts? He won't touch education, which is almost half the budget?--so when the situation worsens under Arnold, people will blame Republicans.

78 posted on 08/26/2003 11:15:34 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson