Skip to comments.
Is Bustamante Saying Two Different Things?
Belly of the Beast Blog ^
| August 24, 2003
| Eric Hogue
Posted on 08/25/2003 8:58:42 PM PDT by Eric Hogue 1380 KTKZ
The entire staff at 1380 KTKZ has been concerned with Cruz Bustamante's seemingly 'double speak' when it comes to English and Spanish public statements.
(Excerpt) Read more at ktkz.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1380ktkz; chalupa; erichogue; tacobell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
The entire staff at 1380 KTKZ has been concerned with Cruz Bustamante's seemingly 'double speak' when it comes to English and Spanish public statements.
Tonight, Fox News has released a concerning story about such a concern. Is Cruz saying one thing in English and another in Spanish? Is he offering two different messages and promises? Due to the media being too busy to record and translate, KTKZ is trying to provide this perspective of reporting in the near future.
I personally believe that Bustamante is saying two different things to two different audiences in California - one legal residence and the other illegal residence!
See "Belly of the Beast Blog" for the Fox News link and article.
To: Eric Hogue 1380 KTKZ
If he's a liberal...at least three....not including what he really means.
2
posted on
08/25/2003 9:01:07 PM PDT
by
PoorMuttly
(technique working like a charm, Laz)
To: PoorMuttly
Does anyone really expect don Cruz Bustamante de Me.Ch.A. to say the same thing in English as he said in Spanish? don Bustamonte only wants to do one thing, and that is accomplish Reconquista by any means necessary and lying to do that is fair.
3
posted on
08/25/2003 9:05:40 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Eric Hogue 1380 KTKZ
Find me a politician who does not speak entirely different positions based on the crowd being spoken to?
The headlines in California of late make me wonder just how coherent the press has been for fifty years?
I read yesterday that Bustamante may be bad for business! For a reality check......California is bad for business! How is this news?
4
posted on
08/25/2003 9:08:01 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(Gerbils belong in cages.)
To: SandRat
don Bustamonte only wants to do one thing, and that is accomplish Reconquista by any means necessary and lying to do that is fair. And thanks to Tom McClintock, Cruz is cruising to victory.
5
posted on
08/25/2003 9:08:21 PM PDT
by
montag813
To: SandRat
They think their cause is SO just it is moral to cheat their way into power.
Screw them.
6
posted on
08/25/2003 9:11:33 PM PDT
by
PoorMuttly
(Muttly hungry.)
To: montag813
Agreed. McClintock should withdraw and give his support to the only viable Republican candidate. I know, I will get slammed and berated for saying that, but let's be realistic. Bustamante is almost a shoo-in at the current pace of events. How is California better off for that?
7
posted on
08/25/2003 9:14:04 PM PDT
by
lmr
(When will these liberals just STFU?)
To: blackdog
When the alpoMEDIA & Hollyweird/DemoWit Crowd manages to get don Bustamonte de Me.Ch.A. anointed as the Al Calde de California that w-i-l-l be bad for business; there will be mass Exodus before inauguration day that will make the original Exodus look like a 2 horse home town parade in comparison.
8
posted on
08/25/2003 9:14:16 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
You say this guy's real name is Arafat?
9
posted on
08/25/2003 9:25:52 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: RobbyS
His first cousin who likes to shave.
10
posted on
08/25/2003 9:31:50 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: lmr
GIVE US ALL A BREAK, lmr and montag13, do you really believe the LA Times polls that Cruz is cruising to victory? I'm sure wouldn't believe that bit of media manipulation. And be careful what you wish for -- Arnold couldn't carry Tom's notebooks on fiscal matters. He knows NOTHING...and I mean it.
To: montag813
And thanks to Tom McClintock, Cruz is cruising to victory.Arnold controls his own destiny. McClintock can't hurt him--he can only hurt himself.
If he's stubborn and stays to the liberal side of the ledger, he will forfeit the support of the conservative base and lose.
Is Arnold smart eough to do what it takes to win? I doubt it.
To: lmr
McClintock should withdraw and give his support to the only viable Republican candidateArnold should withdraw and shift his support to the only viable conservative still in the race--McClintock--or abandon some of his whacked-out liberal positions and shift to the right.
To: sruleoflaw
True, He doesn't compare to McClintock... But McClintock will not win in any event. That is the point I am making.
14
posted on
08/25/2003 9:39:03 PM PDT
by
lmr
(When will these liberals just STFU?)
To: Eric Hogue 1380 KTKZ
The only positive for Cruz is that he looks like a Saint when you stand him next to Arnold's moral fiber. One good thing about Arnold, he is showing how the moderate wing of the Republican party is as phony as any Clinton supporters.
15
posted on
08/25/2003 9:46:22 PM PDT
by
Russell Scott
(Without massive intervention from Heaven, America doesn't have a prayer.)
To: Kevin Curry
If this happens... See a repeat of Davis-Simon. Only this time it will be Bustamante-McClintock. We all know who came out on the winning end the last time and that brought us the recall now. I don't think Californians would go for another recall. It's too much of a circus now. If you want a true Conservative in there, that is wishful thinking. The closest you will get is a Liberal-Republican. That is Arnold. Reagan will not return to California, never. Perhaps California is lost and we should just write it off... One of these days, Florida will be like California... Too many Liberal Dems and not enough Conservative balance. At that point, the electoral college is blown to bits. Then we end up like Canada, where a small geographic area of the country controls the rest of the Nation. I say any electable Republican is good for now, then work on the Conservative angle after that. Besides, a Republican governor for Cali can help give that state to Bush in the next presidential election.
16
posted on
08/25/2003 9:50:28 PM PDT
by
lmr
(When will these liberals just STFU?)
To: Kevin Curry
If this happens... See a repeat of Davis-Simon. Only this time it will be Bustamante-McClintock. We all know who came out on the winning end the last time and that brought us the recall now. I don't think Californians would go for another recall. It's too much of a circus now. If you want a true Conservative in there, that is wishful thinking. The closest you will get is a Liberal-Republican. That is Arnold. Reagan will not return to California, never. Perhaps California is lost and we should just write it off... One of these days, Florida will be like California... Too many Liberal Dems and not enough Conservative balance. At that point, the electoral college is blown to bits. Then we end up like Canada, where a small geographic area of the country controls the rest of the Nation. I say any electable Republican is good for now, then work on the Conservative angle after that. Besides, a Republican governor for Cali can help give that state to Bush in the next presidential election.
17
posted on
08/25/2003 9:50:47 PM PDT
by
lmr
(When will these liberals just STFU?)
To: Russell Scott
Bustamante is part of a blatantly racist organization. He has about as much moral fiber as KKK Byrd and Manslaughter Kennedy. I think Arnold has just led a life of excess. Key word being has.
18
posted on
08/25/2003 9:51:55 PM PDT
by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: lmr
You sound like a proud member of the "we can't get enough votes to convict him, so let's roll over for Bill Clinton" Republican senators during impeachment. Here's a radical thought. How about letting McClintock roll out a couple of TV ads, participate in a debate or two, and then see what the polls say before you start shoveling dirt on him? I know, call me crazy.
To: william clark
I won't call you crazy... McClintock has risen in many of the polls as of late... However, I still think that what you suggest will never happen and that limited time is working against everyone, including Arnold. One person suggested it earlier, if Arnold would just make a solid "NO NEW TAXES" pledge, he might be in.
20
posted on
08/25/2003 10:01:27 PM PDT
by
lmr
(When will these liberals just STFU?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson