Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: rdb3
The guy's a weasel. IMHO.
3 posted on 08/25/2003 5:18:09 PM PDT by martian_22 (Got Mars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Clark; Comical Addition to Motley Democratic Crew.
Gen. Clark would certainly be a colorful addition to this already outrageous crop of Bush-Bashing, tax-raising lunatics vying for the nomination of the Democratic Party. However, many analysts cannot understand how the General could possibly imagine himself having any credibility left in the eyes of the electorate, left right and in between, after clearly announcing on CNN that Operation Iraqi Freedom could not possibly succeed. Of course that type of pessimism is to be expected from an officer with Clark's dire tenure as Supreme Commander of NATO forces in Kosovo, he was fired by the Clinton Administration. It took the General the duration of one of the most expensive sieges in the history of this nation, a seventy day bombardment that targeted hospitals and broadcasters killing civilians, to secure a surrender from his opposing force in Kosovo, whom he outnumbered in excess of ten to one. The simple statistical proofs of his incompetence in Kosovo are staggering. Were it not for the level headedness of a British Officer, General Sir Michael Jackson, Clark could have driven us into a war with Russia. Gen. Clark, upon being informed that Russian forces had taken Pristina without informing him, ordered the British to repulse them by force. The wiser Gen. Jackson responded, "I will not start the third World War for you".
Undoubtedly, his past ineptitude leaves Gen. Clark extremely envious of the success of Opn. Iraqi Freedom. But if he thinks he can get back at the Bush Administration by running for President, I'm afraid he's sorely mistaken. The fact that Democrats are reaching out to him is indicative of the critical state their party is in, given that their current field of nine candidates has an ambassador, a governor, and five senators. This General's four stars couldn't even win him four votes. Gen Clark's record makes him more unelectable than anyone else on the ballot.
4 posted on 09/12/2003 10:29:47 PM PDT by Ryan Bailey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: martian_22; Registered
"This guy's a weasel . . "

STOP!! right there!

In the first place, this "guy" is NOT a REAL GENERAL.

He is an appendage that was removed from Bill Clinton's ass during said socialist emperor's reign of terror over the United States military (approximately EIGHT LONG YEARS).

This GENERAL PAIN IN THE ASS was nothing more than an instrument in the hands of Bill Clinton and the Democratic Party to impliment SOCIAL ENGINEERING beginning on the "captured" audience of our military.

Their plan didn't work then, and if anybody knows squat about our military, General Pain Clark, Bill Clinton, or the Democraps, they know this much.

Who is Genral Clark?

This is the very sam SOB who sat silent during the (attempted) raping, stealing, and plundering of our U.S. Servicemen and Women's ABSENTEE BALLOT RIGHT TO VOTE!!

The Military Have A VOTE!??
I Diddunt Know Dat!!

Gore Confers With Gen. Clark

Democrap Military Ballot Box

Democrats See Gen Clark As A Prize

Wesley Clark: General Issues (The Weasel)

7 posted on 09/20/2003 7:22:42 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson