Skip to comments.
Angrier and Angrier
National Review ^
| 08/25/03
| Michael Ledeen
Posted on 08/25/2003 7:08:24 AM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
People need to have faith in George. W Bush. Sometimes conservatives tend to panic at the first sign of "difficulties".
Stay the course.
1
posted on
08/25/2003 7:08:24 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Dog; Howlin; Miss Marple; Sabertooth; terilyn; JohnHuang2; MeeknMing; grimalkin; MelBelle; ...
Ledeen ping.
2
posted on
08/25/2003 7:09:07 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
("I'm not going to start the Third World War for you"- Gen. Sir Michael Jackson to Gen. Wesley Clark)
To: Pokey78; MLedeen
Ledeen is correct. The State Department is an utter and total failure.
3
posted on
08/25/2003 7:13:33 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Until Kofi Annan rides buses in Jerusalem, he just won't care. - The Spotted Owl)
To: Pokey78
Pretty accurate representation of the State Dept though.
4
posted on
08/25/2003 7:17:20 AM PDT
by
Arkie2
(It's a literary fact that the number of words written will grow exponentially to fill the space avai)
To: Pokey78
I don't know, Washinton DC has been an insane asylum as far back as I can remember. Digging around in the historical record makes me suspect that DC has been an insane asylum for quite a while. Maybe since the 1830s.
5
posted on
08/25/2003 7:20:16 AM PDT
by
Iris7
("..the Eternal Thompson Gunner.." - Zevon)
To: Pokey78
What is really amazing to me is that in spite of overwhelming evidence, mounting by the day, that those people have no idea whatever of what they are doing, those people believe that they are of good will and doing good work. Insane, no?
6
posted on
08/25/2003 7:23:17 AM PDT
by
Iris7
("..the Eternal Thompson Gunner.." - Zevon)
To: Arkie2
True, but I got visions of conservatives screaming about the slow going in Afghanistan over a year ago. I especially remember Krauthammer almost having a fit.
A week later we were in Kabul.
7
posted on
08/25/2003 7:23:24 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
("I'm not going to start the Third World War for you"- Gen. Sir Michael Jackson to Gen. Wesley Clark)
To: Pokey78
See Tagline.
8
posted on
08/25/2003 7:23:56 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(This Islamo-fascism has been brought to you by Saudi Arabia!)
To: Pokey78
Ledeen seems to blame Bush's current weakness on the intelligence agencies. My theory is that the problem lies with Bush himself. He is too weak of a person and not ruthless enough to destroy our enemies. So instead, he beats up on our friends (Israel).
9
posted on
08/25/2003 7:52:56 AM PDT
by
LarryM
To: Pokey78
While I have no doubt that the intelligence community ignores warnings that it should not ignore, hindsight is 20/20. What this article doesn't discuss are the whistle-blowers and warnings that don't pan out. It is a balancing act between believing every warning and believing none.
They have the same problem with volcano warnings. If they see signs of volcanic activity, they don't immediately predict a volcano or call for an evacuation. Why? Because if they evacuate a city and the volcano doesn't erupt, (A) there will be a backlash against those who made the warning and (B) people will be less likely to pay attention to the next warning. Similarly, if the intelligence community went into full alert every time it had a warning, we'd likely see a lot of false alarms and instead of complaining about how they missed the warnings for 9/11, we'd be complaining about how they keep over-reacting.
In hindsight, it is easy to separate the real warnings from the false ones, just as it is with volcanoes. It is very easy to look at only half of the story and say that they weren't paying enough attention once we know better.
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Pokey78
...the NSC under Bush the Father simply refused to believe that Saddam would invade Kuwait,...That doesn't seem to jibe with the April Gadsby scenario.
13
posted on
08/25/2003 8:00:06 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: Pokey78
14
posted on
08/25/2003 8:10:50 AM PDT
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
(Rummy to Rats, 8/21* This much is certain: their cause is lost. That regime will not be coming back.)
To: Pokey78
15
posted on
08/25/2003 8:17:01 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
To: Pokey78
People are extremely fickle. I remember when the UCLA fans were calling for John Wooden to be fired. His crime was that his teams had won 7 championships in a row and one year he did not win one. More recently, U of MD fans were calling for Gary Williams to be fired. His crime was his team had failed to win more than 2 games in the NCAA tournament. 2 years later, he won the championship and now all is forgiven.
GW Bush will have a very tough election unless there is peace and prosperity.
16
posted on
08/25/2003 8:18:00 AM PDT
by
staytrue
To: seamole
If LarryM couldn't bash Bush, he would have nothing to post.
17
posted on
08/25/2003 8:22:34 AM PDT
by
carton253
(All I need to know about Islam I learned on 9/11/2001)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
I like Bush a lot, and I think he's giving the right broad orders, they're just not being fully implemented by some of his subordinates.This article tiptoes around, but never clearly states, how far the federal government has been klintonized during the regime of Bill and Hiltery. Even "protected" civil servants found out that if someone ratted them out, and said they had a picture of George H. W. Bush on their desk, bad things would happen to their careers. Generals who retired in disgust during the klinton years, and there were many, were warned to keep quiet, or see "complications" develop with their pensions.
The State Department was pretty well klintonized even before the klintons took power. But they spread their evil, and their own "sleeper agents" throughout the civil service system in other angencies, too. The entire emphasis was on not reporting what the klintons did not want to hear, and making sure your subordinates didn't nose around in those areas, either.
19
posted on
08/25/2003 8:59:00 AM PDT
by
300winmag
(All that is gold does not glitter.)
To: Pokey78
Would somebody please answer a reasonably simple question?
Does the legal concept "treason" still exist?
20
posted on
08/25/2003 9:04:44 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson